↓ Skip to main content

Identifying nurses' rewards: a qualitative categorization study in Belgium

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Identifying nurses' rewards: a qualitative categorization study in Belgium
Published in
Human Resources for Health, July 2006
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-4-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara De Gieter, Rein De Cooman, Roland Pepermans, Ralf Caers, Cindy Du Bois, Marc Jegers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 17 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Psychology 10 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,113,493
of 12,936,999 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#648
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,017
of 295,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#43
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,936,999 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.