The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Time-to-update of systematic reviews relative to the availability of new evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-018-0856-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rabia Bashir, Didi Surian, Adam G. Dunn |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 33 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 58% |
| Scientists | 11 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,253,145
of 26,388,722 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#169
of 2,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,354
of 452,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#6
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.