↓ Skip to main content

Detection of Asherman’s syndrome after conservative management of placenta accreta: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Detection of Asherman’s syndrome after conservative management of placenta accreta: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13256-018-1869-7
Authors

Kenro Chikazawa, Ken Imai, Wang Liangcheng, Shigetane Sasaki, Isao Horiuchi, Tomoyuki Kuwata, Kenjiro Takagi

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,130,929
of 12,963,942 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#771
of 2,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,177
of 316,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#102
of 324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,963,942 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.