↓ Skip to main content

Development and validation of self-reported line drawings for assessment of knee malalignment and foot rotation: a cross-sectional comparative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Development and validation of self-reported line drawings for assessment of knee malalignment and foot rotation: a cross-sectional comparative study
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-10-57
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah L Ingham, Amanda Moody, Abhishek, Sally A Doherty, Weiya Zhang, Michael Doherty

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 6 30%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#9,657,257
of 12,582,044 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#894
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,231
of 334,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,582,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them