↓ Skip to main content

Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
377 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
Title
Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study
Published in
Critical Care, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/cc9070
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Benes, Ivan Chytra, Pavel Altmann, Marek Hluchy, Eduard Kasal, Roman Svitak, Richard Pradl, Martin Stepan

Abstract

Stroke volume variation (SVV) is a good and easily obtainable predictor of fluid responsiveness, which can be used to guide fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients. During major abdominal surgery, inappropriate fluid management may result in occult organ hypoperfusion or fluid overload in patients with compromised cardiovascular reserves and thus increase postoperative morbidity. The aim of our study was to evaluate the influence of SVV guided fluid optimization on organ functions and postoperative morbidity in high risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 252 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 53 20%
Other 36 14%
Student > Postgraduate 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 11%
Student > Master 22 8%
Other 72 27%
Unknown 25 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 198 75%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 34 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,159,735
of 17,351,915 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,896
of 5,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,735
of 224,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#34
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,351,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.