↓ Skip to main content

SRH and HrQOL: does social position impact differently on their link with health status?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
SRH and HrQOL: does social position impact differently on their link with health status?
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cyrille Delpierre, Michelle Kelly-Irving, Mette Munch-Petersen, Valérie Lauwers-Cances, Geetanjali D Datta, Benoît Lepage, Thierry Lang

Abstract

Self-rated Health (SRH) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are used to evaluate health disparities. Like all subjective measures of health, they are dependent on health expectations that are associated with socioeconomic characteristics. It is thus needed to analyse the influence played by socioeconomic position (SEP) on the relationship between these two indicators and health conditions if we aim to use them to study health disparities. Our objective is to assess the influence of SEP on the relationship between physical health status and subjective health status, measured by SRH and HRQoL using the SF-36 scale.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 32%
Social Sciences 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Psychology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 21 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2012.
All research outputs
#15,241,259
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,247
of 14,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,830
of 243,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#146
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.