↓ Skip to main content

Effect of garlic on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 1,955)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
31 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
191 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Effect of garlic on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, June 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-8-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Ried, Oliver R Frank, Nigel P Stocks, Peter Fakler, Thomas Sullivan

Abstract

Non-pharmacological treatment options for hypertension have the potential to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease at a population level. Animal studies have suggested that garlic reduces blood pressure, but primary studies in humans and non-systematic reviews have reported mixed results. With interest in complementary medicine for hypertension increasing, it is timely to update a systematic review and meta-analysis from 1994 of studies investigating the effect of garlic preparations on blood pressure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 4 1%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 337 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 117 33%
Student > Master 39 11%
Researcher 31 9%
Other 25 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 6%
Other 62 17%
Unknown 59 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 5%
Other 56 16%
Unknown 63 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2024.
All research outputs
#466,230
of 25,888,937 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#7
of 1,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#738
of 88,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,955 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them