@bengoldacre Er und sein Team verglichen 67 publizierte Trials mit den preregistrierten Protokollen. In 87% der Fälle fanden sie Abweichungen, die einen Correction Letter an das jeweilige Journal rechtfertigten. Nur 40% davon wurden von den Journals veröff
@aggieerin @hardsci This study tried to intervene with letters to the editor: https://t.co/dB5PFOiYOE and this ongoing experiment is intervening at the peer review stage https://t.co/iCAV6f96Mu
@thebyrdlab 👍 sure, but not by “letters to the editor”, right?! 🤦🏻♂️ @bengoldacre https://t.co/Oa4AAJ2R25
RT @bengoldacre: @GustavNilsonne on post publication peer review you might find this interesting https://t.co/Dzfl1hJ37t
@GustavNilsonne on post publication peer review you might find this interesting https://t.co/Dzfl1hJ37t
@peterdalle Ben Goldacre och hans gäng har gjort mycket kring det där. Tex https://t.co/S1Nn6P7qlv https://t.co/u2AUuCGhFW
RT @bengoldacre: After COMPare... https://t.co/bPT2h0ZmAv These folks set out to develop automated methods of outcome switching in clinic…
RT @bengoldacre: After COMPare... https://t.co/bPT2h0ZmAv These folks set out to develop automated methods of outcome switching in clinic…
RT @bengoldacre: After COMPare... https://t.co/bPT2h0ZmAv These folks set out to develop automated methods of outcome switching in clinic…
After COMPare... https://t.co/bPT2h0ZmAv These folks set out to develop automated methods of outcome switching in clinical trials. Tough job, great that they've shared their manually created training set. https://t.co/B3LGTCg4Ya
@SamueleMarcora @dnunan79 @andykirkland71 I don't think they would. See Ben Goldacre's COMPARE trial (and by the way, we wouldn't know this without preregistration) https://t.co/ppS26VAIV6
Are journals complying with #CONSORT reporting standards effectively? May be not! #publicationethics #medcomms #transparency https://t.co/VfrAGlqwkr
What’s driving outcomes switching in clinical trials? Not pharmaceutical companies. https://t.co/eEFMvNQt2d https://t.co/wSiaLiWhbE p27
RT @ChrisW_PharmaG: 58/67 clinical trials published in leading medical journals had outcomes switching, says @HenryMDrysdale at @_OpenPharm…
RT @ChrisW_PharmaG: 58/67 clinical trials published in leading medical journals had outcomes switching, says @HenryMDrysdale at @_OpenPharm…
58/67 clinical trials published in leading medical journals had outcomes switching, says @HenryMDrysdale at @_OpenPharma @pintofscience event in #Oxford tonight. https://t.co/vvxRk4DKJJ https://t.co/ZQNHfX1GzL https://t.co/6BuFxZRTUZ
RT @bengoldacre: Trial outcomes redacted in NEJM. We experienced repeated similar absurdities during the COMPare Trials project: https://t…
Extraordinary stuff in these tweets. How can you report the results of a scientific experiment without revealing what you set out to test in the first place?
RT @bengoldacre: Trial outcomes redacted in NEJM. We experienced repeated similar absurdities during the COMPare Trials project: https://t…
RT @bengoldacre: Trial outcomes redacted in NEJM. We experienced repeated similar absurdities during the COMPare Trials project: https://t…
RT @bengoldacre: Trial outcomes redacted in NEJM. We experienced repeated similar absurdities during the COMPare Trials project: https://t…
Trial outcomes redacted in NEJM. We experienced repeated similar absurdities during the COMPare Trials project: https://t.co/Dzfl1hJ37t
RT @janvyjidak: @KevinH_PhD @ethanjweiss @kcklatt @Cell_Metabolism some further thoughts Goldacre (2019) https://t.co/de0PG0MDdk Goldacre…
@KevinH_PhD @ethanjweiss @kcklatt @Cell_Metabolism some further thoughts Goldacre (2019) https://t.co/de0PG0MDdk Goldacre (2019) https://t.co/I3TkrbPx4a https://t.co/VvGqmsf6y4
RT @mr_astvad: A lot of misreported trials out there with exploratory outcomes not predefined. @bengoldacre et al did this survey https://…
A lot of misreported trials out there with exploratory outcomes not predefined. @bengoldacre et al did this survey https://t.co/cH52N05kHv Ioannidis at #SSAI2019
RT @HengartnerMP: @peterkinderman @recover2renew @Martin_Ploederl Yes, it's a damning verdict. And things have not really improved. Trials…
@YoniFreedhoff @whsource @KevinH_PhD Well, if it's happening in fancy medical journals, how do you think your mob are doing? https://t.co/n2V2wibqbm
RT @DrLizaMD: Hey there @TheLancet @NEJM @BMJ @JAMA @AnnalsofIM Could you please comment on this: https://t.co/gHiV7X57wR Your articles…
RT @DrLizaMD: Hey there @TheLancet @NEJM @BMJ @JAMA @AnnalsofIM Could you please comment on this: https://t.co/gHiV7X57wR Your articles…
RT @DrLizaMD: These journals shape policy folks. "We found high levels of outcome misreporting amongst the five top medical journals listed…
RT @DrLizaMD: Hey there @TheLancet @NEJM @BMJ @JAMA @AnnalsofIM Could you please comment on this: https://t.co/gHiV7X57wR Your articles…
RT @DrLizaMD: Hey there @TheLancet @NEJM @BMJ @JAMA @AnnalsofIM Could you please comment on this: https://t.co/gHiV7X57wR Your articles…
Hey there @TheLancet @NEJM @BMJ @JAMA @AnnalsofIM Could you please comment on this: https://t.co/gHiV7X57wR Your articles often make claims that drive calls for policy changes. This impacts ordinary people. You have a duty to correct inaccuracies. #EAT
These journals shape policy folks. "We found high levels of outcome misreporting amongst the five top medical journals listed as endorsing the CONSORT statement on correct reporting of clinical trials. Most of these journals rejected correction letters..."
G訳『はい、それはとんでもない評決です。そして、物事は本当に改善されていません。試験は依然として選択的に公開されており、結果は選択的に報告されており、好ましくない結果は回転し、誤って伝えられています。 例えば、』
RT @HengartnerMP: @peterkinderman @recover2renew @Martin_Ploederl Yes, it's a damning verdict. And things have not really improved. Trials…
RT @HengartnerMP: @peterkinderman @recover2renew @Martin_Ploederl Yes, it's a damning verdict. And things have not really improved. Trials…
RT @HengartnerMP: @peterkinderman @recover2renew @Martin_Ploederl Yes, it's a damning verdict. And things have not really improved. Trials…
RT @HengartnerMP: @peterkinderman @recover2renew @Martin_Ploederl Yes, it's a damning verdict. And things have not really improved. Trials…
RT @HengartnerMP: @peterkinderman @recover2renew @Martin_Ploederl Yes, it's a damning verdict. And things have not really improved. Trials…
RT @HengartnerMP: @peterkinderman @recover2renew @Martin_Ploederl Yes, it's a damning verdict. And things have not really improved. Trials…
@peterkinderman @recover2renew @Martin_Ploederl Yes, it's a damning verdict. And things have not really improved. Trials are still selectively published, outcomes selectively reported, and unfavorable findings spun and misrepresented. E.g. https://t.co/9i
COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/ub0UA4wumC
Moving the goalposts - allowed in the world's most prominent medical research journals, according to Oxford researcher @bengoldacre in @BBCRadio4 https://t.co/qu81SXABUY https://t.co/YYwZzDFxZE https://t.co/6NC0HKHU4Q
COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time | Trials | Full Text https://t.co/Fswug6qq56
RT @Students4BE: And the 2nd article from the COMPARE trial is here.. "a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported…
RT @Students4BE: And the 2nd article from the COMPARE trial is here.. "a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported…
RT @Students4BE: And the 2nd article from the COMPARE trial is here.. "a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported…
RT @Students4BE: And the 2nd article from the COMPARE trial is here.. "a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported…
RT @Students4BE: And the 2nd article from the COMPARE trial is here.. "a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported…
And the 2nd article from the COMPARE trial is here.. "a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time". https://t.co/OYJNk1oICG #EBMLive2019
Manuscript_Preregistration.pdf https://t.co/pnFYulXe5r Discussion I think you should compare these findings to those being seen in clinical research, where preregistration has been required by law for a few decades. See https://t.co/Chbrpd99bw and https:
RT @bengoldacre: So: I invite you to please read these papers. They're the best thing I have been involved in this year. They are relevant…
@threadreaderapp @jboylan @ADAlthousePhD @scottlemaire You might be interested in this paper on what happened when researchers pointed out errors in published papers. https://t.co/e9i5J0cDgQ
RT @cochranemthds: Very interesting articles with insights on why reporting bias occurs from the researchers' perspective & journal editor…
RT @EllaFlemyng: 2 important new papers in #Trialsjournal from @bengoldacre & @COMPare_Trials Correcting & monitoring misreported trials i…
RT @bengoldacre: So: I invite you to please read these papers. They're the best thing I have been involved in this year. They are relevant…
RT @JOHesselberg: Two very interesting articles from the @COMPare_Trials project are out. Silent outcome switching is all too common, even…
Not all research is equal. If a paper is biased, it can bias systematic reviews as well. Our course teaches you to effectively review evidence and recognise bias before it can impact your research. Book your place today #systematicreview. Visit https://t.c
Two very interesting articles from the @COMPare_Trials project are out. Silent outcome switching is all too common, even in top journals. #ReportingBias #OpenScience
RT @tessajlrichards: What do patients need/want most? Lay summaries of research or better understanding of flaws in how its reported? https…
What do patients need/want most? Lay summaries of research or better understanding of flaws in how its reported? https://t.co/D5aogqEeSa
A must-read for those interested in checking the effectiveness of their treatments: https://t.co/Pi6xOtI5S0
Sobering study of major journals laissez faire approach to tackling the persistent problem of researchers failing to report on pre specified outcome measures. https://t.co/D5aogqEeSa
This is the first empirical study of major academic journals’ willingness to publish a cohort of comparable and objective correction letters on misreported high-impact studies. https://t.co/n4iKCLlo0g
COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time by @bengoldacre et al. in @BioMedCentral https://t.co/n4iKCLlo0g
RT @bengoldacre: @COMPare_Trials We sent correction letters on every misreported clinical trial in the world's biggest medical journals, to…
COMPare: an important paper documenting serious self-interested scientific deficiencies, reporting defects, and ethical breaches on the part of both medical researchers and the top journals where they publish their findings. https://t.co/MlU8eLM8aD
RT @DEPTH_LSHTM: 1/2 In case you missed it, #DEPTH researcher @cicely partnered with @COMPare_Trials group as part of our efforts to improv…
1/2 In case you missed it, #DEPTH researcher @cicely partnered with @COMPare_Trials group as part of our efforts to improve #transparency and #ethics in research, as explained by lead author @bengoldacre's @twitter account. The papers are available here: h
RT @bengoldacre: @COMPare_Trials We sent correction letters on every misreported clinical trial in the world's biggest medical journals, to…
COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time https://t.co/y0RP5JVNUQ #trialsjournal
RT @FairlieHall: @velogubbed @DrEReinhold @MECFSNews Wondering if you have seen this https://t.co/OG7PKlR2HM
RT @bengoldacre: @COMPare_Trials We sent correction letters on every misreported clinical trial in the world's biggest medical journals, to…
RT @bengoldacre: @COMPare_Trials We sent correction letters on every misreported clinical trial in the world's biggest medical journals, to…
Very interesting episode of @hertzpodcast on misreporting in scientific papers of clinical trials https://t.co/22Sp4ZZbwE Here link to the COMPare paper reporting about the misreported trials: https://t.co/WLQqm9ztk7
Top journals trying not to take responsibility for misreported trials https://t.co/QmjnAWURNm
RT @hertzpodcast: Here’s the prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials https://t.co/CAbDi0Zpyj and the quali…
RT @hertzpodcast: Here’s the prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials https://t.co/CAbDi0Zpyj and the quali…
Here’s the prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials https://t.co/CAbDi0Zpyj and the qualitative analysis of researchers’ responses to critical correspondence https://t.co/MRePJJslhZ that we discuss in the podcast episode htt
LOLS COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time https://t.co/zwlLgpl8qE #trialsjournal
@ThyroidTrust @PokrajacAna @Soc_Endo @ChannaJayasena The marvellous @bengoldacre Goldacre (of @openprescribing) & team have just published a very interesting study. https://t.co/iFbxlwP7Bu Lots of food for thought.
RT @bengoldacre: @COMPare_Trials We sent correction letters on every misreported clinical trial in the world's biggest medical journals, to…
RT @bengoldacre: @COMPare_Trials We sent correction letters on every misreported clinical trial in the world's biggest medical journals, to…
RT @bengoldacre: @COMPare_Trials We sent correction letters on every misreported clinical trial in the world's biggest medical journals, to…
RT @jamesheathers: Annals, BMJ: published all online instantly (comments) Lancet: published strong majority (80%) in print (~5mo delay) JAM…
COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time https://t.co/uWDFwc3znf #trialsjournal
RT @bengoldacre: So: I invite you to please read these papers. They're the best thing I have been involved in this year. They are relevant…
RT @bengoldacre: So: I invite you to please read these papers. They're the best thing I have been involved in this year. They are relevant…
RT @HenryMDrysdale: @bengoldacre @carlheneghan @krmahtani I also couldn't believe the unwillingness of some journal editors to engage. *91%…
RT @bengoldacre: @COMPare_Trials We sent correction letters on every misreported clinical trial in the world's biggest medical journals, to…
RT @bengoldacre: @COMPare_Trials We sent correction letters on every misreported clinical trial in the world's biggest medical journals, to…
RT @bengoldacre: @COMPare_Trials We sent correction letters on every misreported clinical trial in the world's biggest medical journals, to…
RT @eturnermd1: "Conclusions: All five journals were listed as endorsing CONSORT, but all exhibited extensive breaches of this guidance, an…
RT @eturnermd1: "Conclusions: All five journals were listed as endorsing CONSORT, but all exhibited extensive breaches of this guidance, an…
RT @bengoldacre: So: I invite you to please read these papers. They're the best thing I have been involved in this year. They are relevant…