↓ Skip to main content

ChIA-PET tool for comprehensive chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tag sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
patent
11 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
265 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
573 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
Title
ChIA-PET tool for comprehensive chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tag sequencing
Published in
Genome Biology, February 2010
DOI 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guoliang Li, Melissa J Fullwood, Han Xu, Fabianus Hendriyan Mulawadi, Stoyan Velkov, Vinsensius Vega, Pramila Nuwantha Ariyaratne, Yusoff Bin Mohamed, Hong-Sain Ooi, Chandana Tennakoon, Chia-Lin Wei, Yijun Ruan, Wing-Kin Sung

Abstract

Chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tag sequencing (ChIA-PET) is a new technology to study genome-wide long-range chromatin interactions bound by protein factors. Here we present ChIA-PET Tool, a software package for automatic processing of ChIA-PET sequence data, including linker filtering, mapping tags to reference genomes, identifying protein binding sites and chromatin interactions, and displaying the results on a graphical genome browser. ChIA-PET Tool is fast, accurate, comprehensive, user-friendly, and open source (available at http://chiapet.gis.a-star.edu.sg).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 573 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 3%
Germany 5 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 524 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 173 30%
Researcher 155 27%
Student > Master 65 11%
Student > Bachelor 37 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 24 4%
Other 73 13%
Unknown 46 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 314 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 132 23%
Computer Science 32 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 3%
Engineering 8 1%
Other 18 3%
Unknown 53 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,703,883
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,393
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,949
of 102,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.