↓ Skip to main content

ChIA-PET tool for comprehensive chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tag sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
patent
6 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
235 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
557 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
Title
ChIA-PET tool for comprehensive chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tag sequencing
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2010
DOI 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guoliang Li, Melissa J Fullwood, Han Xu, Fabianus Hendriyan Mulawadi, Stoyan Velkov, Vinsensius Vega, Pramila Nuwantha Ariyaratne, Yusoff Bin Mohamed, Hong-Sain Ooi, Chandana Tennakoon, Chia-Lin Wei, Yijun Ruan, Wing-Kin Sung

Abstract

Chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tag sequencing (ChIA-PET) is a new technology to study genome-wide long-range chromatin interactions bound by protein factors. Here we present ChIA-PET Tool, a software package for automatic processing of ChIA-PET sequence data, including linker filtering, mapping tags to reference genomes, identifying protein binding sites and chromatin interactions, and displaying the results on a graphical genome browser. ChIA-PET Tool is fast, accurate, comprehensive, user-friendly, and open source (available at http://chiapet.gis.a-star.edu.sg).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 557 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 3%
Germany 5 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 508 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 174 31%
Researcher 149 27%
Student > Master 63 11%
Student > Bachelor 37 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 24 4%
Other 70 13%
Unknown 40 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 313 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 127 23%
Computer Science 31 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 3%
Engineering 7 1%
Other 16 3%
Unknown 47 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,683,871
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#2,095
of 4,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,067
of 166,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#29
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.