The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Guidelines for open peer review implementation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Research Integrity and Peer Review, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41073-019-0063-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tony Ross-Hellauer, Edit Görögh |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 8 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 8% |
Switzerland | 5 | 6% |
United States | 4 | 5% |
Indonesia | 3 | 4% |
Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
Greece | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 44 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 56 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 17% |
Scientists | 13 | 15% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Librarian | 3 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 19% |
Unknown | 12 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 7 | 15% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 29% |
Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#400,318
of 25,880,948 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#16
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,037
of 369,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them