↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a cluster-randomized, culturally tailored, community health worker home-visiting diabetes intervention versus standard care in American Samoa

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a cluster-randomized, culturally tailored, community health worker home-visiting diabetes intervention versus standard care in American Samoa
Published in
Human Resources for Health, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12960-019-0356-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuo J. Huang, Omar Galárraga, Kelley A. Smith, Saipale Fuimaono, Stephen T. McGarvey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 27%
Social Sciences 2 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Other 2 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,459,847
of 13,628,925 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#190
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,623
of 253,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,628,925 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them