@ID_Denmark That's your specific experience. There's a whole world out there. Asia, for example, home to 1/3 of the world's population: https://t.co/ZtIypuaa4X BMC, 2012: https://t.co/mfWIyW4hgg
@ID_Denmark There was not a consensus pre-2020. This is false. https://t.co/7yKZT6Kv8U https://t.co/xWaNI5uJYa https://t.co/cf07ASVY6b
@Tertianship @Ardislayer @JanusSaves1975 @comox7 @trainwithtish And there are plenty of studies that suggest they DO work. https://t.co/KMa3NFALxS https://t.co/b89djaiHqz https://t.co/yC5lkCItbD https://t.co/vJ7YEc5OLT
@KyleL357 @JohnKohler3 @Alchemywizzard @IanCopeland5 @va_shiva 1) Are masks the only NPI I mentioned? 2) That's not true. https://t.co/20xP6MTPg0
@veganaiZe >>Please point me to them... I did a fair amount of searching and was only able to find the one.<< You could find only one?🤔 Below are only randomized, not including experimental. https://t.co/5IRCyrThm8 https://t.co/bdOpiGV1cf ht
@RealKeriSmith Here are the links https://t.co/1s8GGBVzI3
@Eric_Schmitt 2012 Suess: household transmission of "Flu" can be reduced by use of NPI, such as facemasks & intensified hand hygiene, when implemented early & used diligently. Concerns about acceptability & tolerability should not be reason aga
@weisseseite @Tzerberus1 @docbrandenburg Auf was wartest du? Weißt du was eine physische Barriere ist? Schau mal, eine von vielen Studien: https://t.co/zro4Sn9Mo3 Beantwortest du jetzt die Frage?
@LiesAreProof @ScottAdamsSays >>Show me ANY study pre-2020 that says this....ANY STUDY.<< Here you go: https://t.co/AUd8Hr2ESJ I also have to issue a warning for wasting my time in case you don't like anything in that study 😌 https://t.co/R3n
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @kevinnbass: The study actually failed to meet its primary endpoint due to lack of adherence, and investigators had to slice the study u…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 2010: https://t.co/Fu1PM1WGdK MacIntyre 2011: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Aiello 2012: https://t.co/KKnPcrFXkX Suess 2012: https://t.co/Lako
RT @kevinnbass: The study actually failed to meet its primary endpoint due to lack of adherence, and investigators had to slice the study u…
RT @kevinnbass: The study actually failed to meet its primary endpoint due to lack of adherence, and investigators had to slice the study u…
RT @kevinnbass: The study actually failed to meet its primary endpoint due to lack of adherence, and investigators had to slice the study u…
RT @kevinnbass: The study actually failed to meet its primary endpoint due to lack of adherence, and investigators had to slice the study u…
RT @kevinnbass: The study actually failed to meet its primary endpoint due to lack of adherence, and investigators had to slice the study u…
RT @kevinnbass: The study actually failed to meet its primary endpoint due to lack of adherence, and investigators had to slice the study u…
RT @kevinnbass: The study actually failed to meet its primary endpoint due to lack of adherence, and investigators had to slice the study u…
RT @kevinnbass: The study actually failed to meet its primary endpoint due to lack of adherence, and investigators had to slice the study u…
RT @kevinnbass: The study actually failed to meet its primary endpoint due to lack of adherence, and investigators had to slice the study u…
@davidjbehrens @LRHub @DavidAFrench @zeynep @VPrasadMDMPH I like this thread breaking down the fallacy of "it would work if everyone would do it" https://t.co/OKOgQkWpT1
@DavidAFrench @zeynep Also, a good rebuttal: https://t.co/OKOgQkWpT1
RT @kevinnbass: The study actually failed to meet its primary endpoint due to lack of adherence, and investigators had to slice the study u…
RT @kevinnbass: The study actually failed to meet its primary endpoint due to lack of adherence, and investigators had to slice the study u…
RT @kevinnbass: The study actually failed to meet its primary endpoint due to lack of adherence, and investigators had to slice the study u…
The study actually failed to meet its primary endpoint due to lack of adherence, and investigators had to slice the study up to find significant results somewhere. @zeynep doesn't share that though. https://t.co/yO0Vd1P5ZF https://t.co/UhcuXWBNFh
Liked on YouTube: Yes, masks still work https://t.co/UVvx2TXy8g February 21, 2023 at 09:13PM -- Patreon: https://t.co/aYqZbMaI9f I rarely read YouTube comments these days, so if you want me to see your comment, here is how you can contact me directly… ht
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
Cowling 2008: https://t.co/CqIMx6hO56 MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/Jli36we4pc Loeb 2009: https://t.co/AAhP6ErWfP Canini 2010: https://t.co/BzqyWfBJoD MacIntyre 2011: https://t.co/Jli36we4pc Aiello 2012: https://t.co/J7nOKM67Dx Suess 2012: https://t.co/zj
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 2010: https://t.co/Fu1PM1WGdK MacIntyre 2011: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Aiello 2012: https://t.co/KKnPcrFXkX Suess 2012: https://t.co/Lako
@MIGO_Offiziell https://t.co/MMLqih1jWp Das ist die einzige RCT Studie mit signifikanter Reduktion darin. Da wurde der Effekt von Masken im Haushalt auf die SaR im Haushalt untersucht. Das hat nichts mit der Wirksamkeit der Maskenpflicht im Supermarkt/ÖPNV
RT @UltiGuard: The role of facemasks and hand hygiene in the prevention of influenza transmission in households: results from a cluster ran…
@CLOUTECHRISTIN2 @HomoSap60422481 @Dover63A @ErikLoridan @france_soir C'est bizarre, Thorsten Suess 2012 n'a pas la même conclusion https://t.co/8iOcGX1pBv https://t.co/b8XAPNdF9l
Dans les études montrant un effet positif du port du masque qui sont référencées dans cette revue, par exemple https://t.co/w3ajnE6NPv https://t.co/WcgA9ZiQGE, le port du masque s'effectue AU FOYER, en présence d'une personne malade. 2/n
@Queen_Of_Light @Krefelder78 @rjungbeck @G_UllrichFDP Kannst du Studien lesen? Dann mal her mit deinem "Intellekt". https://t.co/d1zHWGs6Xr
In the hand hygiene table it's listed as showing that the interventions can work. In the mask table, it's listed as showing no significant effect! What's going on? I can't find anything in the paper itself to justify this. https://t.co/UIqc48d4RT https://t
RT @yfuruse: 単純な質問です。 ご紹介された論文を引用している次の二つの論文について言及されていないのはなぜでしょう。インフルエンザとマスクについての議論はその後も進んでいると思いますが。 https://t.co/E27GOP7X6Z https://t.co…
単純な質問です。 ご紹介された論文を引用している次の二つの論文について言及されていないのはなぜでしょう。インフルエンザとマスクについての議論はその後も進んでいると思いますが。 https://t.co/E27GOP7X6Z https://t.co/ba6gYTa7f4
RT @Ecccm2Ecccm: @zOjzQ8sS9mqZ5yQ @BikkuriSeitai @jtjG57PEu5AanQN いくつか突っ込みたいところがあるのですが,まずあなたは僕が紹介したメタ解析論文を引用されています. 引用すべきはこれですよね. https://…
@zOjzQ8sS9mqZ5yQ @jtjG57PEu5AanQN 私の提示した Suess2012 https://t.co/nrJA9NfQcc これがメタ解析の材料になっているということでOKですね.
@zOjzQ8sS9mqZ5yQ @jtjG57PEu5AanQN あなたが引用したかったのはこれですよね. https://t.co/nrJA9NfQcc 異論を唱えるのですから,まず引用文献を間違える,ということでは困ります.さらに僕がそれを指摘しても確認もせず自分の正当性を主張するのみ. 雑すぎます.まずご自分の引用間違いに関する僕の指摘を検討ください.
@zOjzQ8sS9mqZ5yQ @BikkuriSeitai @jtjG57PEu5AanQN いくつか突っ込みたいところがあるのですが,まずあなたは僕が紹介したメタ解析論文を引用されています. 引用すべきはこれですよね. https://t.co/nrJA9NfQcc 異論を唱えるのですから,まず引用文献を間違える,という雑なことでは困ります.
@mikanramune117 @FCplo2gQDeGlNpu @Yahukomemin @NekoMoRi_n @iranko55555 @aaaaahhhhh1122 @Haruhito_BAK @naniwanojinji @0x0gonta @shiganainet @ST_SZK01 はい rct6つのうち 信頼区間が1を跨いでないのがひとつだけ その唯一のものがこれhttps://t.co/PFgUWmn65U マスク単体では全て1を跨ぎ、減ったようにみえるのはマスク+手指衛生 手指衛生
@FCplo2gQDeGlNpu @Yahukomemin @shiganainet @ST_SZK01 @naniwanojinji そして最期は https://t.co/p2WxYpe0J3 この論文中で示されたrctで1を跨いでいないのはひとつだけ 残りは全て1を跨いでいます この唯一効果があったとされるrctがこちら https://t.co/hjPUhRYYv6 内容を見てみると マスク単体で1をまたいないものはなく、全て1を跨いでいないのは手指衛生ありき https://t.co/3Dj
@jrdblades @OneDadsFinance @CBCNB Masks on household transmission: https://t.co/uBXG2ZT7Dt
@jrdblades @tupelohoneyyyyy @MAKEnotMIKE @NickMackx @tylerblack32 @CDCgov It's not my study. You wanted one that proved my point. Guess I'll pick another. Again, it's weird that so many of these exist when obviously masks don't work, right? https://t.co/x
RT @MariolaPR: The role of facemasks and hand hygiene in the prevention of influenza transmission in households: results from a cluster ran…
The role of facemasks and hand hygiene in the prevention of influenza transmission in households: results from a cluster randomised trial; Berlin, Germany, 2009-2011 | BMC Infectious Diseases | Full Text https://t.co/uEDnRQQ9eV
@tanaryo1008 @ankoku_black @selpy5 @Kizashi_S あなたが引用した画像のメタ解析のrct6つ https://t.co/2OFx16u3VO 手指衛生兼ねた論文 マスクつけても変わりなし https://t.co/3EuTt4Gzuw インフルエンザへのマスク 有意でなかった https://t.co/8sNojPh27L こちらも手指衛生兼ねたもの むしろ手指衛生だけより逆効果
@SmileFreeUK @GarySidley @WHO Suess (2012): "Results suggest that household transmission of influenza can be reduced by the use of NPI, such as facemasks and intensified hand hygiene, when implemented early and used diligently." https://t.co/QofOorQ4Dy
@LawtonTri @SGriffin_Lab @LucyofL @R_Hughes1 Although one thing that always interests me is there were (imo perfectly fine) RCTs of NPIs for flu pre-pandemic, e.g. https://t.co/wBElvKugQj
@blackberryxyz @EWinterNM @gregggonsalves Session (2012): "Results suggest that household transmission of influenza can be reduced by the use of NPI, such as facemasks and intensified hand hygiene, when implemented early and used diligently." https://t.co/
@Alex_Reynard @Bigpicturejoe2 @Moms4Liberty This is the actual study from your chart, which states masks work https://t.co/LYFGzMFiTA https://t.co/pgbP6Y0WrN
@septselector @gummitch_uk @SethMacFarlane Well, um, how can I put this delicately? They do. Masks help stopping viruses. Has been proven numerous times, even waaaaaaaaa~y before the current pandemic. Sources, you say? Sure, glad you asked! (2011) https:
@LaffersNapkin @jenneraub @GMichaelDeacon There is one RCT where mask wearing within 36 hrs of symptom was associated with statistically significant benefit. https://t.co/RdUb47kqse
@skelliam @GOPLeader @UMich And another RCT study from 2009-2011 in Berlin found similar efficacy as other studies provided masks were worn within 36 hours of symptoms. https://t.co/1t0SvAhheR
@musk_c @GovKemp Or this RCT from 2009-2011 in Berlin that found similar efficacy as other studies when masks were worn within 36 hours of symptoms. https://t.co/1t0SvAhheR
@BryanMittler @SenTomCotton @UMich Here's another one... This RCT from 2009-2011 in Berlin found similar efficacy as other studies provided masks were worn within 36 hours of symptoms. So I've now provided multiple studies - not just one. https://t.co/1t0S
@BryanMittler @SenTomCotton @UMich This RCT from 2009-2011 in Berlin found similar efficacy as other studies provided masks were worn within 36 hours of symptoms. https://t.co/1t0SvAhheR
@joergkuntz @EddyAges @Sanrudi2 @picpictureman @schlockback Hier, mehr Überheblichkeit: https://t.co/9u3cvFR7un
Indeed this conclusion is also supported by previous RCTs (for flu) such as https://t.co/dfXMus8hsn & https://t.co/tg11kavsdU. Both studies investigate masks as source controls by following household contacts of index patients.
@ContemporaryJud @NikoTalk https://t.co/MvX8vmcB6x https://t.co/QF3ZS3cUzi https://t.co/nDvgOD8QZX https://t.co/gAhRXuT65t Bidirectional impact of imperfect mask use on reproduction number of COVID-19: A next generation matrix approach - ScienceDirect
@ale_22689 @jasonrantz #12. 2012 study showed that the neither mask-group or the masked hand-washing group alone lowered influenza infection. Also, no mask group or combined masked groups lowered flu-like infections. This was only a household study. http
@amoser @AndreasHohener In Japan ist das tragen der Hygienemasken schon lange institutionalisiert. Studien zur Wirksamkeit von Masken gab es schon früher https://t.co/vE2D6jfX9n Aber zur Aussage von Koch, ich glaube er hat es verschlafen für Masken zu s
@GreatKarlis @MekijsNazis Zinātniski pētījumi video? Jūs esat vēl stulbāks kā domāju. Tā izskatās atsauce uz zinātnisku pētījumu: https://t.co/lVTk88PA1g
@TheFeiler @ron_psimas @drsimonegold Suess et al. 2012 https://t.co/iUGTwVZUr9 https://t.co/tPB86MBFyS
RT @zsimayi: Ngelaxesha there's enough evidence on the protective role of face masks: https://t.co/xApRv5XWK9 https://t.co/Ub5cGgEBPP https…
Ngelaxesha there's enough evidence on the protective role of face masks: https://t.co/xApRv5XWK9 https://t.co/Ub5cGgEBPP https://t.co/szmD0zRqrt
RT @donutgerb: @rafebeeson @MartinKulldorff @RWMaloneMD @VPrasadMDMPH Look at the studies in the sys review. Very low adherence in test gro…
@rafebeeson @MartinKulldorff @RWMaloneMD @VPrasadMDMPH Look at the studies in the sys review. Very low adherence in test groups. Groups that have higher adherence showed statistical significance consistently. https://t.co/uuywunfnoZ
@ScottAdamsSays Mask MANDATES are ineffective against infectious respiratory disease. There are numerous peer reviewed studies documenting this. https://t.co/McCK5t4xtY https://t.co/WJY7lyL0aI https://t.co/sjQK5jgLJ1 https://t.co/wVzQSvKPvE