Title |
Strategies for eliciting and synthesizing evidence for guidelines in rare diseases
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0713-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Menaka Pai, Cindy H. T. Yeung, Elie A. Akl, Andrea Darzi, Christopher Hillis, Kimberly Legault, Joerg J. Meerpohl, Nancy Santesso, Domenica Taruscio, Madeleine Verhovsek, Holger J. Schünemann, Alfonso Iorio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 7 | 21% |
Ireland | 3 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
United States | 3 | 9% |
Australia | 2 | 6% |
Germany | 2 | 6% |
Lebanon | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 55% |
Scientists | 12 | 36% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
Other | 18 | 17% |
Unknown | 28 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 31% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
Psychology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 17% |
Unknown | 31 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,426,222
of 24,988,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#167
of 2,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,450
of 357,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#10
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,988,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.