↓ Skip to main content

An observational report of intensive robotic and manual gait training in sub-acute stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
An observational report of intensive robotic and manual gait training in sub-acute stroke
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-9-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas Conesa, Úrsula Costa, Eva Morales, Dylan J Edwards, Mar Cortes, Daniel León, Montserrat Bernabeu, Josep Medina

Abstract

The use of automated electromechanical devices for gait training in neurological patients is increasing, yet the functional outcomes of well-defined training programs using these devices and the characteristics of patients that would most benefit are seldom reported in the literature. In an observational study of functional outcomes, we aimed to provide a benchmark for expected change in gait function in early stroke patients, from an intensive inpatient rehabilitation program including both robotic and manual gait training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 136 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 21%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 16%
Engineering 14 10%
Neuroscience 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 32 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2012.
All research outputs
#16,061,963
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#812
of 1,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,344
of 257,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.