| Title |
Why we need a small data paradigm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1366-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric B. Hekler, Predrag Klasnja, Guillaume Chevance, Natalie M. Golaszewski, Dana Lewis, Ida Sim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 14% |
| United States | 6 | 12% |
| France | 5 | 10% |
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| Germany | 3 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 65% |
| Scientists | 9 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 174 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 57 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 10% |
| Engineering | 15 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 8% |
| Psychology | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 22% |
| Unknown | 63 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,111,579
of 25,914,360 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#776
of 4,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,662
of 345,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#15
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,914,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.