↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Systematic review of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-12-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex R Kemper, Heather A Van Mater, Remy R Coeytaux, John W Williams, Gillian D Sanders

Abstract

Treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) may improve outcomes compared to conventional therapy (e.g., non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intra-articular corticosteroids). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of DMARDs versus conventional therapy and versus other DMARDs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 3%
Brazil 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 97 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 49%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 16 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2012.
All research outputs
#7,658,783
of 23,848,132 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,400
of 3,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,071
of 159,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#14
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,848,132 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.