Title |
Effectiveness of a training-of-trainers model in a HIV counseling and testing program in the Caribbean Region
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Resources for Health, February 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-7-11 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cynthia A Hiner, Brinnon Garrett Mandel, Marcia R Weaver, Douglas Bruce, Robert McLaughlin, Jean Anderson |
Abstract |
To evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of a voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) training program based on a training-of-trainers (TOT) model in the Caribbean Region, we gathered data on the percentage of participants trained as VCT providers who were providing VCT services, and those trained as VCT trainers who were conducting VCT training. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
Researcher | 8 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 14% |
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
Other | 13 | 23% |
Unknown | 5 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 12 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 21% |
Psychology | 7 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 21% |
Unknown | 6 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#1,223
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,465
of 108,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#19
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.