↓ Skip to main content

Building capacity: a cross-sectional evaluation of the US Training Institute for Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 tweeters
Title
Building capacity: a cross-sectional evaluation of the US Training Institute for Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health
Published in
Implementation Science, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13012-019-0947-6
Authors

Cynthia A. Vinson, Mindy Clyne, Nina Cardoza, Karen M. Emmons

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2019.
All research outputs
#954,673
of 14,122,411 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#288
of 1,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,216
of 292,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#34
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,122,411 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.