↓ Skip to main content

Interpreting the concordance statistic of a logistic regression model: relation to the variance and odds ratio of a continuous explanatory variable

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interpreting the concordance statistic of a logistic regression model: relation to the variance and odds ratio of a continuous explanatory variable
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-12-82
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter C Austin, Ewout W Steyerberg

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 4 3%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 129 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 24%
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Master 20 15%
Other 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 34 25%
Unknown 6 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 42%
Computer Science 10 7%
Mathematics 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Other 32 23%
Unknown 14 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,658,139
of 14,156,489 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#559
of 1,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,090
of 262,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,156,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them