↓ Skip to main content

Supporting health behaviour change in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with telephone health-mentoring: insights from a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Family Practice, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Supporting health behaviour change in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with telephone health-mentoring: insights from a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Family Practice, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-13-55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia A E Walters, Helen Cameron-Tucker, Helen Courtney-Pratt, Mark Nelson, Andrew Robinson, Jenn Scott, Paul Turner, E Haydn Walters, Richard Wood-Baker

Abstract

Adoption and maintenance of healthy behaviours is pivotal to chronic disease self-management as this influences disease progression and impact. This qualitative study investigated health behaviour changes adopted by participants with moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recruited to a randomised controlled study of telephone-delivered health-mentoring.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 4%
United States 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 155 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 24%
Student > Master 40 24%
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Other 9 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 11 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 17%
Psychology 21 13%
Social Sciences 18 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 24 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2012.
All research outputs
#3,292,197
of 12,373,620 outputs
Outputs from BMC Family Practice
#459
of 1,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,407
of 120,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Family Practice
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.