↓ Skip to main content

Developmental origins of non-communicable disease: Implications for research and public health

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
34 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
537 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
500 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Developmental origins of non-communicable disease: Implications for research and public health
Published in
Environmental Health, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-11-42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Barouki, Peter D Gluckman, Philippe Grandjean, Mark Hanson, Jerrold J Heindel

Abstract

This White Paper highlights the developmental period as a plastic phase, which allows the organism to adapt to changes in the environment to maintain or improve reproductive capability in part through sustained health. Plasticity is more prominent prenatally and during early postnatal life, i.e., during the time of cell differentiation and specific tissue formation. These developmental periods are highly sensitive to environmental factors, such as nutrients, environmental chemicals, drugs, infections and other stressors. Nutrient and toxicant effects share many of the same characteristics and reflect two sides of the same coin. In both cases, alterations in physiological functions can be induced and may lead to the development of non-communicable conditions. Many of the major diseases - and dysfunctions - that have increased substantially in prevalence over the last 40 years seem to be related in part to developmental factors associated with either nutritional imbalance or exposures to environmental chemicals. The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) concept provides significant insight into new strategies for research and disease prevention and is sufficiently robust and repeatable across species, including humans, to require a policy and public health response. This White Paper therefore concludes that, as early development (in utero and during the first years of postnatal life) is particularly sensitive to developmental disruption by nutritional factors or environmental chemical exposures, with potentially adverse consequences for health later in life, both research and disease prevention strategies should focus more on these vulnerable life stages.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 500 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 481 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 90 18%
Researcher 78 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 14%
Student > Bachelor 44 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 6%
Other 105 21%
Unknown 86 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 7%
Social Sciences 32 6%
Other 95 19%
Unknown 116 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2021.
All research outputs
#683,636
of 20,710,163 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#165
of 1,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,544
of 140,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,710,163 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them