↓ Skip to main content

Inter-assessor reliability of practice based biomechanical assessment of the foot and ankle

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Inter-assessor reliability of practice based biomechanical assessment of the foot and ankle
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-5-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah L Jarvis, Christopher J Nester, Richard K Jones, Anita Williams, Peter D Bowden

Abstract

There is no consensus on which protocols should be used to assess foot and lower limb biomechanics in clinical practice. The reliability of many assessments has been questioned by previous research. The aim of this investigation was to (i) identify (through consensus) what biomechanical examinations are used in clinical practice and (ii) evaluate the inter-assessor reliability of some of these examinations.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Japan 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 64 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 27%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Lecturer 6 9%
Other 23 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 47%
Unspecified 9 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Sports and Recreations 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Other 9 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2013.
All research outputs
#1,333,754
of 13,317,108 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#124
of 534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,092
of 121,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,317,108 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them