↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

A mathematical reason for FEV1/FVC dependence on age

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Wikipedia Dimensions citations
Title
A mathematical reason for FEV1/FVC dependence on age
Published in
Respiratory Research, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-13-57
Pubmed ID
22762777
Authors

Tomasz Gólczewski, Wojciech Lubiński, Andrzej Chciałowski

Abstract

Recent studies have showed that FEV1/FVC describing correspondence between the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) depends significantly on age. However, the nature of this dependence is uncertain. The study aim is to analyze mathematically the relationship between FEV1 and FVC to find a cause of the FEV1/FVC dependence on age in healthy subjects.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 28%
Other 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 12 26%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 17%
Engineering 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 8 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,171,179
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#933
of 2,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,818
of 244,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#28
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.