The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Pertussis vaccination in Child Care Workers: room for improvement in coverage, policy and practice
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-12-98 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kirsty Hope, Michelle Butler, Peter D Massey, Patrick Cashman, David N Durrheim, Jody Stephenson, April Worley |
Abstract |
The "Staying Healthy in Child Care" Australian guidelines provide for illness and disease exclusions and encourage vaccination of staff in child care settings, however these requirements are not subject to accreditation and licensing, and their level of implementation is unknown. This study aimed to describe pertussis vaccination coverage in child care workers in a regional area of northern NSW during 2010; review current staff pertussis vaccination practices; and explore barriers to vaccination. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 4 | 20% |
Hungary | 1 | 5% |
Italy | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
Scientists | 5 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 16% |
Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
Other | 11 | 24% |
Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2017.
All research outputs
#636,812
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#44
of 3,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,265
of 166,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#4
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.