@jaimecor_94 Scooped https://t.co/S3d4Mg8QlJ
@rmp033 Badomics. https://t.co/TxwtKQWzhc
@JukeBaRosh Meh. Most new "ome" terms are either misleading, inaccurate, overselling, or poor use of language. For more on this see https://t.co/RXWYJZzlDR
@MehrbodEstaki https://t.co/2Q5Nb8avOU @phylogenomics
👏🏻uhhuh!
"Phenome" is silly. Stop it. Phenotype is a function of environmental stimulus. Is there an enviromentome? Vibe: https://t.co/S3d4Mg8QlJ
@dirt_toucher I think its part of the ome meme! https://t.co/nknNrewRKL
@BruceHungate I'm in the micro-biome (tiny ecosystem) vs microbi-ome (omics of microbes) camp. (Although I'm trying not to be the instigator of discourse™️) Jonathon Eisen is always relevant: https://t.co/nknNrewRKL
So much this paper
@punk_scientist Always relevant https://t.co/nknNrexpAj
@gaulesinha I wrote a paper about this issue with bad new omics words ... https://t.co/q3oKZn04Cr
@thecrobe Have you read @phylogenomics paper on the subject? https://t.co/DIAfvXDP8a
@duncan_ng This never gets old https://t.co/gRPkRKzHdB
RT @GigaScience: Other highlights from our first year was @phylogenomics publishing his appeal against #Badomics words in our launch issue…
Other highlights from our first year was @phylogenomics publishing his appeal against #Badomics words in our launch issue (https://t.co/vIuJsYcpb5) and @aquaskyline publishing SOAPdenovo2, our most used/cited software paper https://t.co/9Ug5WLd1d4 #gigasci
@CyrilPedia See also badomics https://t.co/u1BYfsx4AQ
@james_t_webber @michaelhoffman See my paper on #Badomics here https://t.co/q3oKZn04Cr which discusses the excessive use of comics words including a reference to paper on the "ome-ome" by @mcdonadt et al. https://t.co/c6Qbu1uX52
@santiagoherrer_ @apalaciosdcata Badomics words and the power and peril of the ome-meme https://t.co/heiOPhRjKC
@eLife Here is my paper https://t.co/RXWYJZhcpJ "Badomics words and the power and peril of the ome-meme" - clearly about basically the same topic as this @elife paper and not mentioned
@CyrilPedia Nice that they mention my #badomics hashtag but surprised and disappointed they did to cite, mention or discuss my paper on this concept https://t.co/RXWYJZhcpJ
@5toLifePod Badomics words and the power and peril of the ome-meme: https://t.co/oNn6N9s9YI
@samknightwrites Thanks and sorry for being so reactionary. I was pointed to the article right when I was revisiting my diatribes against #Badomics words https://t.co/GYJi6xRyxe
RT @phylogenomics: Ok so today at our @genomecenter retreat I jokingly suggested using the term "symbiomics" -- and w/ apologies to @symbio…
Ok so today at our @genomecenter retreat I jokingly suggested using the term "symbiomics" -- and w/ apologies to @symbiomics I still am dead set against using such OMICS words except for humor ... https://t.co/RXWYJZhcpJ
RT @phylogenomics: @muscovitebob @iddux @merenbey @P_Sierocinski @michaelhoffman Well, I wrote a paper about this once .. https://t.co/tlTz…
@muscovitebob @iddux @merenbey @P_Sierocinski @michaelhoffman Well, I wrote a paper about this once .. https://t.co/tlTzMD5cAG
@georgiemetters @AcademicChatter Allow me to introduce you to 'badomics': https://t.co/zHArkJKHft
@AvramHolmes @arxiv Perhaps someone needs to write the equivalent of Eisen's badomics for ML https://t.co/xhNMxhibUb
@KristiGdanetz I remember that term being mentioned in the #badomics commentary by @phylogenomics https://t.co/uRO3vq2L9D
@leland_iii See https://t.co/RXWYJZhcpJ in ribosome and cellulosome ome is for a complex https://t.co/5XBsXKRfiW
RT @phylogenomics: yes @jameshughes1666 @WSJ @leHotz I address that issue in the end of my #Badomics paper https://t.co/vjTQJkD0AK https://…
RT @phylogenomics: yes @jameshughes1666 @WSJ @leHotz I address that issue in the end of my #Badomics paper https://t.co/vjTQJkD0AK https://…
yes @jameshughes1666 @WSJ @leHotz I address that issue in the end of my #Badomics paper https://t.co/vjTQJkD0AK https://t.co/6mmhyuZoeF
Badomics words and the power and peril of the ome-meme https://t.co/vEqSDgrE1g
@ErinSparksPhD @jshoyer Short (if rather grumpy) article from JA Eisen on the rise of various -omics terms: https://t.co/s1RqkEjOU2
@dkmnow @Neuro_Skeptic badomics https://t.co/9xoRbPZHxN
@deevybee @Neuro_Skeptic a case of Badomics? https://t.co/m1BwGYHEfj
Attaching “ome” to your favorite topic does not make it more interesting. Marketing in science drives me batty https://t.co/A5qkd8YXPk
Badomics words and the power and peril of the ome-meme http://t.co/3LQPOI8RIo #gigascience
RT @phylogenomics: @david_colquhoun @harschnitz @BioMickWatson @mbeisen I wrote a paper about this in @GigaScience in 2012 http://t.co/BKib…
@david_colquhoun @harschnitz @BioMickWatson @mbeisen I wrote a paper about this in @GigaScience in 2012 http://t.co/BKibbtAhR9
http://t.co/cGsOlaEvfx by @phylogenomics why environmentome is #badomics; still, great blog post! https://t.co/sSJE8Ps2u5
Awaiting talk by @SCEdmunds from @gigascience (which I love, and not just b/c they published my #baomics paper http://t.co/BKibbtRTfJ)
.@MarcusMunafo @Neuro_Skeptic @neuroconscience @Mattjevans42 @rogierK read this instead http://t.co/d4uoYQ0A6a cc: @GigaScience
RT @LeNematode: Bad "-omics" words, amusing and interesting paper : http://t.co/1U3F1wyRTD by @phylogenomics HT @WonderMixTape
Bad "-omics" words, amusing and interesting paper : http://t.co/jk6uuOwJXL #genomics #Bioinformatics by @phylogenomics ;)
Bad "-omics" words, amusing and interesting paper : http://t.co/jk6uuOwJXL #genomics #Bioinformatics by @phylogenomics ;)
Badomics words and the power and peril of the ome-meme http://t.co/m3GjjvCHcD #gigascience
Bad "-omics" words, amusing and interesting paper : http://t.co/jk6uuOwJXL #genomics #Bioinformatics by @phylogenomics ;)
Bad "-omics" words, amusing and interesting paper : http://t.co/jk6uuOwJXL #genomics #Bioinformatics by @phylogenomics ;)
Bad "-omics" words, amusing and interesting paper : http://t.co/jk6uuOwJXL #genomics #Bioinformatics by @phylogenomics ;)
Bad "-omics" words, amusing and interesting paper : http://t.co/jk6uuOwJXL #genomics #Bioinformatics by @phylogenomics ;)
Bad "-omics" words, amusing and interesting paper : http://t.co/jk6uuOwJXL #genomics #Bioinformatics by @phylogenomics ;)
Bad "-omics" words, amusing and interesting paper : http://t.co/jk6uuOwJXL #genomics #Bioinformatics by @phylogenomics ;)
Bad "-omics" words, amusing and interesting paper : http://t.co/jk6uuOwJXL #genomics #Bioinformatics by @phylogenomics ;)
Bad "-omics" words, amusing and interesting paper : http://t.co/jk6uuOwJXL #genomics #Bioinformatics by @phylogenomics ;)
"Ome"verwhelmed. @phylogenomics Eisen's aside to @NSF_BIO's Genome-Phenome Wiki announcement: http://t.co/rsMi9PstmZ #gigascience
"Ome"verwhelmed. @phylogenomics Eisen's aside to @NSF_BIO's Genome-Phenome Wiki announcement: http://t.co/rsMi9PstmZ #gigascience
Well @DrStelling @westr @Patrick_Hankey I certainly agree everyone needs to cool it w/ #badomics words -- http://t.co/jz2mL1yGyS
#Badomics Words and the Power and Peril of the Ome-Meme http://t.co/CY21fEzrcU
Well @DrStelling @westr @Patrick_Hankey I certainly agree everyone needs to cool it w/ #badomics words -- http://t.co/jz2mL1yGyS
Well @DrStelling @westr @Patrick_Hankey I certainly agree everyone needs to cool it w/ #badomics words -- http://t.co/jz2mL1yGyS
Well @DrStelling @westr @Patrick_Hankey I certainly agree everyone needs to cool it w/ #badomics words -- http://t.co/jz2mL1yGyS
#Badomics makes @naturemagazine Big biology: The ’omes puzzle http://t.co/BCoVceK3v9 The @phylogenomics take on this http://t.co/XpzN2kL03l
@GigaScience McDonald et al (2012) http://t.co/FHhq7qymFO ref 25 is missing a link to Eisen’s badomics article http://t.co/LjJfblms0T
@attilacsordas @Alexbateman1 have you read this? it includes Fig1"How to distinguish the badomes from the good ones?" http://t.co/4TmleOJmCk
.@Laroquod Badomics words and the power and peril of the ome-meme http://t.co/DhU1xNDWWK
#Badomics makes @naturemagazine Big biology: The ’omes puzzle http://t.co/BCoVceK3v9 The @phylogenomics take on this http://t.co/XpzN2kL03l
Regulome... has @phylogenomics weighed in? #badomics See too http://t.co/xQimsK2UvI #btg13
@RigelMD see for example http://t.co/d4uoYQ0A6a
@BaxterTwi not exactly see http://t.co/d4uoYQ0A6a
@hlapp well they were kind of making fun of omics and it was linked to my #badomics paper http://t.co/d4uoYQ0A6a
@digitalbio @mattrussell_PhD also see the ome-meme http://t.co/jDDnHR0EoR by @phylogenomics
@digitalbio @mattrussell_PhD also see the ome-meme http://t.co/jDDnHR0EoR by @phylogenomics
Just saw @phylogenomics GigaScience piece on (not) spreading the ome-meme http://t.co/hfgfJ9J8V2. Authors' contributions?JAE did everything
Just saw @phylogenomics GigaScience piece on (not) spreading the ome-meme http://t.co/hfgfJ9J8V2. Authors' contributions?JAE did everything
Just saw @phylogenomics GigaScience piece on (not) spreading the ome-meme http://t.co/hfgfJ9J8V2. Authors' contributions?JAE did everything
Just saw @phylogenomics GigaScience piece on (not) spreading the ome-meme http://t.co/hfgfJ9J8V2. Authors' contributions?JAE did everything
Just saw @phylogenomics GigaScience piece on (not) spreading the ome-meme http://t.co/hfgfJ9J8V2. Authors' contributions?JAE did everything
@subsurface_life @DrJCThrash it fits all the criteria of a #badomics word http://t.co/BKibbtAhR9 - being around a while not relevant
for more on #badomics see http://t.co/wfuhTacQCF; Kathleen Taylor comment on Nature article - "the logical conclusion has to be 'gnome'".
@Recher_she @phylogenomics @GigaScience shouldn't that be CrossWordome? Or Eisenome? Or OmeMemeOme? http://t.co/wNJ7FNnHE4 #badomics
@Recher_she @phylogenomics @GigaScience shouldn't that be CrossWordome? Or Eisenome? Or OmeMemeOme? http://t.co/wNJ7FNnHE4 #badomics
#Badomics makes @naturemagazine Big biology: The ’omes puzzle http://t.co/BCoVceK3v9 The @phylogenomics take on this http://t.co/XpzN2kL03l
Sobre la moda de los -OMAS: proteoma, transcriptoma, incidentaloma... , etc. http://t.co/cadz1e2OOJ The http://t.co/AJprcS6ul6
#Badomics makes @naturemagazine Big biology: The ’omes puzzle http://t.co/BCoVceK3v9 The @phylogenomics take on this http://t.co/XpzN2kL03l
#Badomics makes @naturemagazine Big biology: The ’omes puzzle http://t.co/BCoVceK3v9 The @phylogenomics take on this http://t.co/XpzN2kL03l
#Badomics makes @naturemagazine Big biology: The ’omes puzzle http://t.co/BCoVceK3v9 The @phylogenomics take on this http://t.co/XpzN2kL03l
“@joshdevans: on the dangerous proliferation of less-than-meaningful '-ome' words http://t.co/sxfCgpsf” food writing is even more diseased
on the dangerous proliferation of less-than-meaningful '-ome' words http://t.co/3qgYUWno
@artologica @phylogenomics haha.. it's the #badomics month.. It's the reference number for http://t.co/jDlRYooH , sorry !
yes!! RT @_zoonotica_: @cupton1 A case of http://t.co/wlRzceNx ? #microtwjc
@cupton1 A case of http://t.co/6OYFIBde ? #microtwjc
Interesting article about all the new -omes and -omics, wonder if we can have a Twitterome? Probably not! http://t.co/JW81eiSu
Badomics words and the power and peril of the ome-meme http://t.co/Pe1IseYi
@ctitusbrown @Awesomics as I said in http://t.co/iH6lY0Ab - if you don't expect people to use it as a serious term then it is OK