↓ Skip to main content

Assembling the evidence jigsaw: insights from a systematic review of UK studies of individual-focused return to work initiatives for disabled and long-term ill people

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Assembling the evidence jigsaw: insights from a systematic review of UK studies of individual-focused return to work initiatives for disabled and long-term ill people
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Clayton, Clare Bambra, Rachael Gosling, Sue Povall, Kate Misso, Margaret Whitehead

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 80 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 27%
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 11 13%
Unspecified 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 26 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 26%
Unspecified 14 17%
Psychology 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Other 11 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,577,153
of 12,372,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,053
of 8,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,605
of 261,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.