RT @wilshica: Adam, I agree keeping up with this is time consuming and complicated. But if a "finding" is an artefact based on a design wea…
RT @wilshica: Adam, I agree keeping up with this is time consuming and complicated. But if a "finding" is an artefact based on a design wea…
RT @wilshica: Adam, I agree keeping up with this is time consuming and complicated. But if a "finding" is an artefact based on a design wea…
RT @wilshica: Adam, I agree keeping up with this is time consuming and complicated. But if a "finding" is an artefact based on a design wea…
RT @wilshica: Adam, I agree keeping up with this is time consuming and complicated. But if a "finding" is an artefact based on a design wea…
RT @wilshica: Adam, I agree keeping up with this is time consuming and complicated. But if a "finding" is an artefact based on a design wea…
They committed blatant fraud. At least four counts of it on my counting.
RT @wilshica: Adam, I agree keeping up with this is time consuming and complicated. But if a "finding" is an artefact based on a design wea…
RT @wilshica: Adam, I agree keeping up with this is time consuming and complicated. But if a "finding" is an artefact based on a design wea…
RT @wilshica: Adam, I agree keeping up with this is time consuming and complicated. But if a "finding" is an artefact based on a design wea…
Adam, I agree keeping up with this is time consuming and complicated. But if a "finding" is an artefact based on a design weakness, it will continue to be "replicated" until you fix the design weakness. Read our short rebuttal, https://t.co/5sT2msb7fi
Thread - important to read replies to misguided comment.
RT @ssppeerroo: @awgaffney Typo in your link. I think this is what you wanted. https://t.co/GejRnROLXv Then there's this. https://t.co/q…
@awgaffney Typo in your link. I think this is what you wanted. https://t.co/GejRnROLXv Then there's this. https://t.co/qUi0ZomPs9 And these. https://t.co/7ePpssJrwo https://t.co/1PamdO93ta https://t.co/550RJxFn3R https://t.co/01cqixlQ8X You've rea
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: No, @tylerblack32 much of the international able-bodied scientific community rejects the PACE trial. It is a cheap sho…
No, @tylerblack32 much of the international able-bodied scientific community rejects the PACE trial. It is a cheap shot to say [only] the @MEcfs community rejects it.
Sorry, @tylerblack32, you are tainting your excellent credibility by spreading this misleading bullshit from Michael Sharpe, which I have spent 5 years exposing. There is no defense for the misleading things he says.
@cheshfr @StanKutcher @CoyneoftheRealm @picardonhealth I understand the many statistical bones that have been picked. Btw, It's literally controversial. Here the authors write against some of the criticism. I know that by and large the CFS/ME community re
@KunstJonas The reanalysis was not accurate, even one of its peer reviewers concluded it was misleading but BMC Psychology still published it. https://t.co/GuRcux3Aoc
@TomKindlon This one? "We prefer the definitions of recovery we used to those used by Wilshire et al. as they give absolute rates more consistent both with the literature, and with our clinical experience" https://t.co/iqxV45VHiX https://t.co/iqxV45VHiX
Oops - https://t.co/heyGY55epe
RT @Kdcfsme: @StenHelmfrid Dr. Tuller fails to state that the PACE authors' response to the reanalysis showed it was misleading, one peer r…
@StenHelmfrid Dr. Tuller fails to state that the PACE authors' response to the reanalysis showed it was misleading, one peer reviewer also concluded it was misleading and the other reviewer should have been disqualified due to his previous involvement in M
RT @jaguilarsw: https://t.co/WWH2xxGUYC Just wow....
RT @jaguilarsw: https://t.co/WWH2xxGUYC Just wow....
https://t.co/WWH2xxGUYC Just wow....
@notchuraverage1 I think it is defensible and has been defended. https://t.co/r59y7K1OOj Trials are hard work. The results are what they are. For those who can benefit, cog behaviour and exercise therapy worked. The effect was modest. But read those
@AJansen118 @VUMChealth @PsychToday That is a misleading article whose authors include activists who wished to discredit the trial. The article below thoroughly refutes it. https://t.co/GuRcux3Aoc
@LocalManAt11 Regarding false claims made by activists see https://t.co/GuRcux3Aoc
RT @Kdcfsme: @ClrBlwrs @meactionscot @CGATist It hasn't been constructive criticism, it has been misinformed and false criticisms designed…
@MECFSNews @guardian The article you link to is misleading and was part of the campaign to discredit the trial, it has been thoroughly refuted by the PACE authors in the article below: https://t.co/GuRcux3Aoc
@tomtom123123123 https://t.co/fU1zY0rULf 英国の2019年のメタ分析で薬物使用のわずかな減少と出ています。 https://t.co/ToGFtvR5Oa 英国のPACE試験2019 対してこちらは12ヶ月の疲労と身体機能の両方で見られたCBTとGETの治療効果に疑問と 英国は完全な2枚舌ですね。
@ruth_lampard @octoberpoppy @MedHums_BMJ The PACE authors' response showed the reanalysis paper was misleading and failed to substantiate its conclusions. https://t.co/kayZcUSZqB
@ClrBlwrs @meactionscot @CGATist It hasn't been constructive criticism, it has been misinformed and false criticisms designed to discredit the research, and ME activists haven't cared that they have been misleading fellow sufferers in the process #mecfs h
RT @OxPsychiatry: The PACE trial of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome: a response to WILSHIRE et al. https://t.co/DzRPAAhp7y
RT @TinaRodwell1: Well their response is laughable and how the BMV allowed them to publish without them trying to protect their reputation…
RT @TinaRodwell1: Well their response is laughable and how the BMV allowed them to publish without them trying to protect their reputation…
RT @TinaRodwell1: Well their response is laughable and how the BMV allowed them to publish without them trying to protect their reputation…
RT @OxPsychiatry: The PACE trial of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome: a response to WILSHIRE et al. https://t.co/DzRPAAhp7y
RT @OxPsychiatry: The PACE trial of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome: a response to WILSHIRE et al. https://t.co/DzRPAAhp7y
Well their response is laughable and how the BMV allowed them to publish without them trying to protect their reputation I’m stunned. Trust in journals is now 0. It was not just MRC that funded this but DWP they could not even be honest about that. This gr
The PACE trial of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome: a response to WILSHIRE et al. https://t.co/DzRPAAhp7y
RT @RobertHMcMullen: @TimHarford I thought you might be interested in this. It would be great if you could cover it on @BBCMoreOrLess http…
RT @keithgeraghty: Their claims are here in BMC https://t.co/5lWLSWEWEy
New from #The_MRC https://t.co/j00boKbw2g The PACE trial of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome: a response to WILSHIRE et al
RT @RobertHMcMullen: @Annakwood @TomKindlon @bengoldacre @wilshica @johnthejack Yes, I still hope that Ben may be persuaded to comment on t…
RT @Hervorrager: I wonder why #scientists esp. in #UK don't hit the ceiling if they consider the incredible trickeries of #PACEtrial author…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: @Annakwood @TomKindlon @bengoldacre @wilshica @johnthejack Yes, I still hope that Ben may be persuaded to comment on t…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
I wonder why #scientists esp. in #UK don't hit the ceiling if they consider the incredible trickeries of #PACEtrial authors to achieve desired & requiered outcome? Not only #health & life of millions of #MECFS patients have been at stake but additi
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: @Annakwood @TomKindlon @bengoldacre @wilshica @johnthejack Yes, I still hope that Ben may be persuaded to comment on t…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: @Annakwood @TomKindlon @bengoldacre @wilshica @johnthejack Yes, I still hope that Ben may be persuaded to comment on t…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
@Annakwood @TomKindlon @bengoldacre @wilshica @johnthejack Yes, I still hope that Ben may be persuaded to comment on the #PACEtrial, despite his friendship with SW – especially now that the PACE authors have admitted their preference for changing outcome m
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Let us not forget that, according to the TMC minutes, actigraphy (an objective outcome measure) was dropped because an…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
#sciencematters #clinicaltrials #research #PACEtrial #bioethics How can @richardhorton1 @TheLancet keep defending this (flawed) #clinicaltrial ? Retraction really is the only option left. #medicaljournals & #peerreview R supposed to be the gate
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Let us not forget that, according to the TMC minutes, actigraphy (an objective outcome measure) was dropped because an…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Let us not forget that, according to the TMC minutes, actigraphy (an objective outcome measure) was dropped because an…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Let us not forget that, according to the TMC minutes, actigraphy (an objective outcome measure) was dropped because an…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Let us not forget that, according to the TMC minutes, actigraphy (an objective outcome measure) was dropped because an…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Let us not forget that, according to the TMC minutes, actigraphy (an objective outcome measure) was dropped because an…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Let us not forget that, according to the TMC minutes, actigraphy (an objective outcome measure) was dropped because an…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: @TimHarford I thought you might be interested in this. It would be great if you could cover it on @BBCMoreOrLess http…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: @sfmnemonic Thought this might be of interest: https://t.co/oCCaOYj77c
Let us not forget that, according to the TMC minutes, actigraphy (an objective outcome measure) was dropped because another trial suggested it was “not useful” i.e. it would not match self-reported subjective outcome measures & pre-trial expectations:
RT @RobertHMcMullen: @TimHarford I thought you might be interested in this. It would be great if you could cover it on @BBCMoreOrLess http…
@TimHarford I thought you might be interested in this. It would be great if you could cover it on @BBCMoreOrLess https://t.co/oCCaOYj77c
RT @RobertHMcMullen: @sfmnemonic Thought this might be of interest: https://t.co/oCCaOYj77c
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
@sfmnemonic Thought this might be of interest: https://t.co/oCCaOYj77c
@david_colquhoun Did you see this, David? Any thoughts? https://t.co/oCCaOYj77c
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
RT @TinaRodwell1: So research is about reaching an outcome you are expecting and ewe should Trust this? @theJeremyVine this is why trust is…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
RT @Notjustfatigue: "Señores" Sharpe, Goldsmith and Chalder. Sorprendente es poco. Hace falta tener la cara muy dura para reconocer que esc…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
RT @Notjustfatigue: "Señores" Sharpe, Goldsmith and Chalder. Sorprendente es poco. Hace falta tener la cara muy dura para reconocer que esc…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
"Señores" Sharpe, Goldsmith and Chalder. Sorprendente es poco. Hace falta tener la cara muy dura para reconocer que escogéis la definición de recuperación que más encaja con vuestras expectativas pre-ensayo en lugar de la del protocolo. #PACEtrial #fraud #
RT @TinaRodwell1: So research is about reaching an outcome you are expecting and ewe should Trust this? @theJeremyVine this is why trust is…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
RT @Good_Reports: Wow. https://t.co/ZVMOdOzyn7
RT @TinaRodwell1: So research is about reaching an outcome you are expecting and ewe should Trust this? @theJeremyVine this is why trust is…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
RT @Good_Reports: Wow. https://t.co/ZVMOdOzyn7
Excellent thread
So research is about reaching an outcome you are expecting and ewe should Trust this? @theJeremyVine this is why trust is lost
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
RT @Good_Reports: Wow. https://t.co/ZVMOdOzyn7
Oh and this not so important piece but the reason for the new response to Sharpe et al ‘Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/cAr3sGCnZO ‘
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
RT @Good_Reports: Wow. https://t.co/ZVMOdOzyn7