RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
@robhastings @profmsharpe @kkelland @ReutersUK @theipaper This thread might pique your journalistic interest: https://t.co/gW8gKDcUKq Things are not as simple as have been presented to you, Mr Hastings.
RT @RobertHMcMullen: Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the…
Wow.
Astonishing admission from #PACEtrial authors that they prefer to use a definition of recovery which differs from the protocol because it matches their pre-trial expectations. https://t.co/8uOF1BYVpM https://t.co/RHiPleNos4
RT @keithgeraghty: Their claims are here in BMC https://t.co/5lWLSWEWEy
RT @keithgeraghty: Their claims are here in BMC https://t.co/5lWLSWEWEy
The PACE trial of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome: a response to WILSHIRE et al https://t.co/jKPZ9gXA1R
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilsh…
RT @keithgeraghty: Their claims are here in BMC https://t.co/5lWLSWEWEy
@StenHelmfrid @CurlyKing79 @Fox_Claire @BBCr4today Dear Mr Helmfrid. We have recently replied in a journal to the critique published in BMC psychology. https://t.co/sBE60b8Lvw Please do not say that we don't respond to reasoned criticism. thank you.
Their claims are here in BMC https://t.co/5lWLSWEWEy
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
@keithgeraghty @geoffbiosci @DrCSGillberg @suejonessays @AmateurFOI @simonjduffy
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
RT @Mattjones0203: "We conclude that neither the criticisms nor the reanalysis offer any convincing reason to change the conclusions of the…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilsh…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilsh…
RT @Kdcfsme: @sashanimmo @MailOnline The PACE authors have just had a new article published showing the reanalysis was inadequate and reach…
RT @OxPsychiatry: The PACE trial of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome: a response to WILSHIRE et al. https://t.co/qvXJLd6hbD
RT @OxPsychiatry: The PACE trial of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome: a response to WILSHIRE et al. https://t.co/qvXJLd6hbD
The PACE trial of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome: a response to WILSHIRE et al. https://t.co/qvXJLd6hbD
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilsh…
"We conclude that neither the criticisms nor the reanalysis offer any convincing reason to change the conclusions of the PACE trial" https://t.co/96tsppNlx6
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilsh…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilsh…
RT @Kdcfsme: @sashanimmo @MailOnline The PACE authors have just had a new article published showing the reanalysis was inadequate and reach…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilsh…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilsh…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilsh…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilsh…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilsh…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: An embarrassingly defensive document. Sample: "There was no change in thedesignated primary outcomes. The changes, whi…
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilsh…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilsh…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilsh…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilsh…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilsh…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilsh…
I read your article with great interest but you never addressed the substantive criticism of the #PACE trial by Wilshire et al. Will you do that in a follow up paoer?
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: An embarrassingly defensive document. Sample: "There was no change in thedesignated primary outcomes. The changes, whi…
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
RT @HenrikVogt: Finally, @BMC Psychology - after months of undue delay - publishes @profmsharpe response to reanalysis of #PACEtrial. I hop…
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
RT @Kdcfsme: This response by the PACE authors shows that sufferers have been irresponsibly misled by patient activists and scientists who…
RT @HenrikVogt: Finally, @BMC Psychology - after months of undue delay - publishes @profmsharpe response to reanalysis of #PACEtrial. I hop…
RT @MECFSNews: The #PACEtrial authors have published a reponse to Wilshire et al: https://t.co/V6fpaFb7Zy
Finally, @BMC Psychology - after months of undue delay - publishes @profmsharpe response to reanalysis of #PACEtrial. I hope the editor @Keith_Laws is opening his eyes to ME activism and that it also seeks to control science... https://t.co/LBPknXSA4v @Kri
@sashanimmo @MailOnline The PACE authors have just had a new article published showing the reanalysis was inadequate and reached the wrong conclusions https://t.co/GuRcux3Aoc
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: An embarrassingly defensive document. Sample: "There was no change in thedesignated primary outcomes. The changes, whi…
RT @MECFSNews: The #PACEtrial authors have published a reponse to Wilshire et al: https://t.co/V6fpaFb7Zy
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: An embarrassingly defensive document. Sample: "There was no change in thedesignated primary outcomes. The changes, whi…
This response by the PACE authors shows that sufferers have been irresponsibly misled by patient activists and scientists who should have known better into falsely believing the PACE trial criticism was valid #mecfs https://t.co/AXQIVx2ng6
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: An embarrassingly defensive document. Sample: "There was no change in thedesignated primary outcomes. The changes, whi…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: An embarrassingly defensive document. Sample: "There was no change in thedesignated primary outcomes. The changes, whi…
RT @MECFSNews: The #PACEtrial authors have published a reponse to Wilshire et al: https://t.co/V6fpaFb7Zy
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: An embarrassingly defensive document. Sample: "There was no change in thedesignated primary outcomes. The changes, whi…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: An embarrassingly defensive document. Sample: "There was no change in thedesignated primary outcomes. The changes, whi…
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: An embarrassingly defensive document. Sample: "There was no change in thedesignated primary outcomes. The changes, whi…
RT @MECFSNews: The #PACEtrial authors have published a reponse to Wilshire et al: https://t.co/V6fpaFb7Zy
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: An embarrassingly defensive document. Sample: "There was no change in thedesignated primary outcomes. The changes, whi…
RT @MECFSNews: The #PACEtrial authors have published a reponse to Wilshire et al: https://t.co/V6fpaFb7Zy
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: An embarrassingly defensive document. Sample: "There was no change in thedesignated primary outcomes. The changes, whi…
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: An embarrassingly defensive document. Sample: "There was no change in thedesignated primary outcomes. The changes, whi…
An embarrassingly defensive document. Sample: "There was no change in thedesignated primary outcomes. The changes, which were only in the scoring of the pre-specified outcomes." Duh, that is a big deal that cannot so readily be dismissed.
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
RT @MECFSNews: The #PACEtrial authors have published a reponse to Wilshire et al: https://t.co/V6fpaFb7Zy
thread.
RT @MECFSNews: The #PACEtrial authors have published a reponse to Wilshire et al: https://t.co/V6fpaFb7Zy
RT @MECFSNews: The #PACEtrial authors have published a reponse to Wilshire et al: https://t.co/V6fpaFb7Zy
The #PACEtrial authors have published a reponse to Wilshire et al: https://t.co/V6fpaFb7Zy
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
RT @profmsharpe: Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl
Our considered response to criticism of the PACE trial now published https://t.co/lJAZe3ZyLl