↓ Skip to main content

On the reliability and validity of manual muscle testing: a literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
292 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1136 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
On the reliability and validity of manual muscle testing: a literature review
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, March 2007
DOI 10.1186/1746-1340-15-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott C Cuthbert, George J Goodheart

Abstract

A body of basic science and clinical research has been generated on the manual muscle test (MMT) since its first peer-reviewed publication in 1915. The aim of this report is to provide an historical overview, literature review, description, synthesis and critique of the reliability and validity of MMT in the evaluation of the musculoskeletal and nervous systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 1115 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 221 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 213 19%
Student > Master 134 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 7%
Student > Postgraduate 62 5%
Other 152 13%
Unknown 279 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 297 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 284 25%
Sports and Recreations 79 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 3%
Engineering 37 3%
Other 97 9%
Unknown 303 27%