RT @fake_journals: We recently captured all the papers that look at Beall's List. This is the most cited paper: Access paper here: https://…
RT @fake_journals: We recently captured all the papers that look at Beall's List. This is the most cited paper: Access paper here: https://…
RT @fake_journals: We recently captured all the papers that look at Beall's List. This is the most cited paper: Access paper here: https://…
"We found that the problems caused by predatory journals are rather limited and regional, and believe that the publishing volumes in such journals will cease growing in the near future."
RT @fake_journals: We recently captured all the papers that look at Beall's List. This is the most cited paper: Access paper here: https://…
RT @fake_journals: We recently captured all the papers that look at Beall's List. This is the most cited paper: Access paper here: https://…
RT @fake_journals: We recently captured all the papers that look at Beall's List. This is the most cited paper: Access paper here: https://…
RT @fake_journals: We recently captured all the papers that look at Beall's List. This is the most cited paper: Access paper here: https://…
RT @fake_journals: We recently captured all the papers that look at Beall's List. This is the most cited paper: Access paper here: https://…
RT @fake_journals: We recently captured all the papers that look at Beall's List. This is the most cited paper: Access paper here: https://…
We recently captured all the papers that look at Beall's List. This is the most cited paper: Access paper here: https://t.co/4r5HayXsYB See more papers here: https://t.co/FnBqXDSgjZ https://t.co/aHg4UZm4PM
RT @fake_journals: . Does anybody know of a recent peer reviewed paper that updates the figures given by Shen and Björk in https://t.co/3vv…
RT @fake_journals: . Does anybody know of a recent peer reviewed paper that updates the figures given by Shen and Björk in https://t.co/3vv…
RT @fake_journals: . Does anybody know of a recent peer reviewed paper that updates the figures given by Shen and Björk in https://t.co/3vv…
RT @fake_journals: . Does anybody know of a recent peer reviewed paper that updates the figures given by Shen and Björk in https://t.co/3vv…
RT @fake_journals: . Does anybody know of a recent peer reviewed paper that updates the figures given by Shen and Björk in https://t.co/3vv…
Shen and Björk (https://t.co/3vvQduELWQ) said: "Predatory journals have rapidly increased their publication volumes from 53,000 in 2010 to an estimated 420,000 articles in 2014, published by around 8,000 active journals" Given that this article was pub
RT @fake_journals: . Does anybody know of a recent peer reviewed paper that updates the figures given by Shen and Björk in https://t.co/3vv…
RT @fake_journals: . Does anybody know of a recent peer reviewed paper that updates the figures given by Shen and Björk in https://t.co/3vv…
RT @fake_journals: . Does anybody know of a recent peer reviewed paper that updates the figures given by Shen and Björk in https://t.co/3vv…
RT @fake_journals: . Does anybody know of a recent peer reviewed paper that updates the figures given by Shen and Björk in https://t.co/3vv…
RT @fake_journals: . Does anybody know of a recent peer reviewed paper that updates the figures given by Shen and Björk in https://t.co/3vv…
. Does anybody know of a recent peer reviewed paper that updates the figures given by Shen and Björk in https://t.co/3vvQduELWQ? This (in our view, very important) paper was published almost ten years ago. Every time we cite it, we always want a more up
Source: https://t.co/FsZTo14LE6
Türkiye'de faaliyet gösteren sahte akademik dergilerin makale basım ücretleri 500-1000 TL arasında değişiyor. Dünyanın diğer ülkelerinde bu ücret ortalama 178 Dolar. https://t.co/jFHaI3xsTW
Very useful: https://t.co/alPSMq3xdW
@choldgraf You can make a request directly at the DOI with the citation you want in the header (e.g. curl -LH "Accept:text/x-bibliography; style=apa" https://t.co/l0G39nrK0f) for CrossRef and DataCite DOIs. For Bibtex use "Accept:application/x-bibtex"
RT @ArmenYuri: ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/I43vMyHNO1
RT @ArmenYuri: ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/I43vMyHNO1
RT @ArmenYuri: ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/I43vMyHNO1
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/I43vMyHNO1
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics: https://t.co/FhIepxTkWw Study by Cenyu Shen and Bo-Christer Björk, published in @biomedcentral https://t.co/1EXkztJ3bR
I just read this paper about predatory journals https://t.co/5utS2gDn4K Is this what you warned us of when you mentioned "fake papers" out of China, @Carnivore_BTC ?
this is just _one_ publisher. At best, (and when it included all MDPI journals - which was incorrect and they were delisted soon after), the entirety of Beall's List of 'predatory journals' was estimated to have at best an income of $74M collectively https
RT @fake_journals: Between 2010 and 2014, the number of predatory articles that were published rose from 53,000 to 420,000. https://t.co/e1…
Between 2010 and 2014, the number of predatory articles that were published rose from 53,000 to 420,000. https://t.co/e1gXueAq0X #OpenAccess #PredatoryPublishing #PredatoryJournals https://t.co/Ckbmpq2ahM
A study about Predatory Journals https://t.co/qlhGTC7oPJ
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/gNxazj1sHv
RT @EricTopol: The rise of "predatory" open-access pseudo-scientific journals http://t.co/8in66OGMhh @BioMedCentral and @NatureNews http://…
In the @CabellsPublish #Blacklist of #predatory journals, 2.4% (234) of all titles are based in China, while over 25% of authors in China and wider Asia region have fallen victim to predatory publishing according to research (Shen & Bjork, 2015: https:
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics @BMCMedicine (Please RT) https://t.co/e1gXueS1px https://t.co/lRcx5SG4En
RT @fake_journals: ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics @BMCMedicine (Please RT) htt…
A study looking at 'predatory' #openaccess journals, RT via @fake_journals & @BMCMedicine #openscience
RT @fake_journals: ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics @BMCMedicine (Please RT) htt…
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics @BMCMedicine (Please RT) https://t.co/e1gXueS1px https://t.co/olJgcVjRox
RT @PaulThir: 53.000 articles publiés dans des #Predatoryjournals en 2010; 420.000 en 2014 ! (Cenyu Shen and Bo-Christer Björk : https://t…
RT @MVanholsbeeck: Study is based on much controversial and anti #OA Beall's list of #predatoryjournals. All these journals not to be put i…
RT @PaulThir: 53.000 articles publiés dans des #Predatoryjournals en 2010; 420.000 en 2014 ! (Cenyu Shen and Bo-Christer Björk : https://t…
RT @MVanholsbeeck: Study is based on much controversial and anti #OA Beall's list of #predatoryjournals. All these journals not to be put i…
RT @PaulThir: 53.000 articles publiés dans des #Predatoryjournals en 2010; 420.000 en 2014 ! (Cenyu Shen and Bo-Christer Björk : https://t…
RT @MVanholsbeeck: Study is based on much controversial and anti #OA Beall's list of #predatoryjournals. All these journals not to be put i…
RT @MVanholsbeeck: Study is based on much controversial and anti #OA Beall's list of #predatoryjournals. All these journals not to be put i…
Study is based on much controversial and anti #OA Beall's list of #predatoryjournals. All these journals not to be put in the same bag IMHO but quite a concerning issue anyway. Between Charybdis of predatory and Scylla of Majors there should be a safer pla
RT @PaulThir: 53.000 articles publiés dans des #Predatoryjournals en 2010; 420.000 en 2014 ! (Cenyu Shen and Bo-Christer Björk : https://t…
53.000 articles publiés dans des #Predatoryjournals en 2010; 420.000 en 2014 ! (Cenyu Shen and Bo-Christer Björk : https://t.co/wrb8My4s7d) Et combien aujourd'hui ? #BadScience https://t.co/TvtvIHkMBd
I emailed the authors for access to the data behind this 2015 @BMCMedicine study a month ago https://t.co/KWsJ0J9jDn Still no reply... It's not sensitive, nor patient data. Now trying to escalate the data access request 😣 Who best to contact for this? @iai
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics @BMCMedicine (Please RT) https://t.co/e1gXueAq0X https://t.co/6i0KTaDwuD
Interessanter Thread zur #FakeScience #FakePublisher #predatoryjournals Diskussion. https://t.co/CmSgGoT2bi
Der #Thread von @JaMoEberl mit Links zu wissenschaftlichen Publikationen zum Thema https://t.co/E4SG8ctu0U
RT @mpoessel: Stellungnahme des Östereichischen Wissenschaftsrats und Wissenschaftsfonds; enthält u.a. den Link auf diesen Überblicksartike…
RT @a_leininger: Wem mein #Thread zu #FakeScience zu lang ist, @JaMoEberl's #Thread ist pointierter aber mindestens genauso so informativ.…
Wem mein #Thread zu #FakeScience zu lang ist, @JaMoEberl's #Thread ist pointierter aber mindestens genauso so informativ.
@DennisEckmeier Being aware of a problem is not enough. You have to solve it. Or at least try to. Look at the figures in Chen/ Björk. They went up ever since. https://t.co/vql3uIJ5Kl
@ph_reporterpool @DennisEckmeier Oder den hier: https://t.co/3hNtIaMqOc
RT @JaMoEberl: Neuer Thread zur #PredatoryJournals #Raubverlag Story: Habe an mehreren Stellen wiss. Publikationen zu diesem Thema angegebe…
RT @JaMoEberl: Neuer Thread zur #PredatoryJournals #Raubverlag Story: Habe an mehreren Stellen wiss. Publikationen zu diesem Thema angegebe…
RT @JaMoEberl: Neuer Thread zur #PredatoryJournals #Raubverlag Story: Habe an mehreren Stellen wiss. Publikationen zu diesem Thema angegebe…
RT @JaMoEberl: Neuer Thread zur #PredatoryJournals #Raubverlag Story: Habe an mehreren Stellen wiss. Publikationen zu diesem Thema angegebe…
RT @JaMoEberl: @AndreasKuckertz @SZ @WDRinvestigativ @NDRrecherche @WISUTweet @spektrum @IlloSZ @ardenthistorian @a_leininger Notiz am Rand…
RT @JaMoEberl: Neuer Thread zur #PredatoryJournals #Raubverlag Story: Habe an mehreren Stellen wiss. Publikationen zu diesem Thema angegebe…
RT @JaMoEberl: Neuer Thread zur #PredatoryJournals #Raubverlag Story: Habe an mehreren Stellen wiss. Publikationen zu diesem Thema angegebe…
RT @JaMoEberl: @AndreasKuckertz @SZ @WDRinvestigativ @NDRrecherche @WISUTweet @spektrum @IlloSZ @ardenthistorian @a_leininger Notiz am Rand…
Der Thread wurde mir zu lang und unübersichtlich. Für einen etwas anderen Fokus hier ein neuer Thread: https://t.co/3hNtIaMqOc
@AndreasKuckertz @SZ @WDRinvestigativ @NDRrecherche @WISUTweet @spektrum @IlloSZ @ardenthistorian @a_leininger Habe hier dazu nochmal einen neuen Thread begonnen: https://t.co/3hNtIaMqOc
Neuer Thread zur #PredatoryJournals #Raubverlag Story: Habe an mehreren Stellen wiss. Publikationen zu diesem Thema angegeben. 1. Da gibt es z.B. https://t.co/5JB5JNEt3n zur Verteilung d Verlage & AutorInnen nach Region & Disziplin. Kurz: V.a. ein
@AndreasKuckertz @SZ @WDRinvestigativ @NDRrecherche @WISUTweet @spektrum @IlloSZ @ardenthistorian @a_leininger Notiz am Rande - Gute Studien zum Thema gibt es ja. Zur Verteilung nach Region und Disziplin: https://t.co/5JB5JNEt3n Unterteilt nach unterschied
RT @JaMoEberl: Hier auch noch eine gute Studie zu diesem Thema, die sich unter anderem regionale Verteilung des Problems ansieht: https://t…
RT @FWFOpenAccess: ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/gAUIC4nyPe
Hier auch noch eine gute Studie zu diesem Thema, die sich unter anderem regionale Verteilung des Problems ansieht: https://t.co/5JB5JNEt3n
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/gAUIC4nyPe
Already in 2014, a group of researchers estimated the number of papers in predatory open access journals ("fake science") to be 400k: https://t.co/u9odL5q7Zz Compared to the total number of proper peer-reviewed papers of 50M, this amounts to almost 1%. #
RT @l_trinquart: I believe the source is a @BMCMedicine paper by @bjorkbobi that found an increase from 53,000 in 2010 to an estimated 420,…
I believe the source is a @BMCMedicine paper by @bjorkbobi that found an increase from 53,000 in 2010 to an estimated 420,000 articles in 2014 https://t.co/0QI3XgjCkf #openaccess #predatory #publishing https://t.co/3wdKcdAoOE
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics https://t.co/Sz6jYTnlId #mlanet18
RT @Research_Tim: The rise of predatory publishing. In 2010 there were 53,000 articles in predatory journals. In 2014 there were 420,000.…
RT @Research_Tim: The rise of predatory publishing. In 2010 there were 53,000 articles in predatory journals. In 2014 there were 420,000.…
RT @Research_Tim: The rise of predatory publishing. In 2010 there were 53,000 articles in predatory journals. In 2014 there were 420,000.…
RT @Research_Tim: The rise of predatory publishing. In 2010 there were 53,000 articles in predatory journals. In 2014 there were 420,000.…
RT @PsychScientists: I think the clearest evidence academic publishing is broken is that it is worth scamming https://t.co/tiKDxJwSxs
RT @Research_Tim: The rise of predatory publishing. In 2010 there were 53,000 articles in predatory journals. In 2014 there were 420,000.…
RT @Research_Tim: The rise of predatory publishing. In 2010 there were 53,000 articles in predatory journals. In 2014 there were 420,000.…
RT @Research_Tim: The rise of predatory publishing. In 2010 there were 53,000 articles in predatory journals. In 2014 there were 420,000.…
RT @PsychScientists: I think the clearest evidence academic publishing is broken is that it is worth scamming https://t.co/tiKDxJwSxs
RT @Research_Tim: The rise of predatory publishing. In 2010 there were 53,000 articles in predatory journals. In 2014 there were 420,000.…
Using number of articles as basis of reward and promotion leads to more publications of dubious quality https://t.co/pmJOEXWZRW
RT @Research_Tim: The rise of predatory publishing. In 2010 there were 53,000 articles in predatory journals. In 2014 there were 420,000.…
RT @Research_Tim: The rise of predatory publishing. In 2010 there were 53,000 articles in predatory journals. In 2014 there were 420,000.…