It is a temptation not to follow @neilhall_uk , the inventor of the Kardashian Index, and thus contribute to make him the most Kardashian of all Kardashian scientists😉
@kmcg2375 @HelenaGranziera I am not that innovative with stats. Only appropriated @neilhall_uk's Kardashian Index (https://t.co/1szucARt5n) as a means to further investigate the 'cult of the guru' in educational leadership.
RT @Vertigo_Itn: Growing gap between "spreading your research" and "real publication"???? Check this article from 2014...... https://t.co/z…
Growing gap between "spreading your research" and "real publication"???? Check this article from 2014...... https://t.co/zzB0YuSnyE NO offence to my twitter friends! @LMU_Volc @LMU_Muenchen @CorCima @FabianWadsworth @janinekrippner @LDR_Strasbourg @RonSuk
אישית, הקיי-אינדקס שלי שואף לאינסוף, אבל אם אי פעם אצליח לסגור את הטוויטר להתרכז בכתיבה, זה יהיה שתי ציפורים במכה אחת. [1] להרחבה, ניתן לקרוא את ה- Methods כאן: https://t.co/gi7FHGwWs7
RT @CSnoswell: A fun tweet for Friday! Unsure how to measure your #academia social media impact? The K-Index or Kardashian index is your an…
Here, @neilhall_uk is talking about my mention of the k-index, aka the Kardashian Index, Hall, 2014: https://t.co/8ITH2b5VxM
A fun tweet for Friday! Unsure how to measure your #academia social media impact? The K-Index or Kardashian index is your answer - a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists https://t.co/rwdS8wH4fC #ecrchat
@ezequielvera https://t.co/6nAyT9CAB9 (no sé por qué el link al artículo sale como roto), opción 2: https://t.co/4TBVzeHK5C (desde acá se puede llegar al artículo que es Open Access)
It is not only productivity and visibility. It is also "popularity".
Maybe a bit cynical to post this on Twitter :) "The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists" https://t.co/hUnYuMnRsz
@whereisdaz That is why, despite the controversy around it, there is value in the argument of Hall's Kardashian index work https://t.co/1szucARt5n
카다시안이 이런 대명사가 되다니, Kardashian Index = a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the direct comparison of numbers of citations and Twitter followers., https://t.co/DarSlVLFvc
“The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists “. Ah sweet Jesus. https://t.co/co4Xq70QTJ
A rede + fama + ciência => K-índex aka "Kardashian índex". Com regressão linear e tudo. https://t.co/AIGxMTRZy1
Jul 2014 Liverpool #ScienceEcon of the #KIndex-fiction of #Twitter followers and #Reuters citations. #ScienceKardashians reach 5! https://t.co/UrXxJca7BQ
Lol, the Kardashian index https://t.co/FRHXrpuubA
Keeping up with the Kardashian index https://t.co/QTe52KwaSt
"I am concerned that phenomena similar to that of Kim Kardashian may also exist in the scientific community. I think it is possible that there are individuals who are famous for being famous (or, to put it in science jargon, renowned for being renowned)" h
This is the best paper ever written: "The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists" https://t.co/PxZdJJ1lwx
RT @ISSN_Diploma: Paper of the day - The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists https://t.co/VyNz1e…
Paper of the day - The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists https://t.co/VyNz1eWIEm
@KenCaldeira @RARohde @KHayhoe @MichaelEMann @EricHolthaus @ClimateCentral @ed_hawkins well, one can always check scientists' individual 'Kardashian index', measuring the discrepancy between an academic's social media profile and publication record https:/
RT @Jozo_Grgic: The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists https://t.co/KEP3QmU46f
RT @Jozo_Grgic: The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists https://t.co/KEP3QmU46f
RT @HughesDC_Muscle: The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists | Genome Biology https://t.co/Z2iJ…
😆😆😆
RT @Jozo_Grgic: The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists https://t.co/KEP3QmU46f
RT @Jozo_Grgic: The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists https://t.co/KEP3QmU46f
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists https://t.co/KEP3QmU46f
RT @HughesDC_Muscle: The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists | Genome Biology https://t.co/Z2iJ…
RT @HughesDC_Muscle: The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists | Genome Biology https://t.co/Z2iJ…
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists | Genome Biology https://t.co/Z2iJcFoMfm
@ReefViruses @GJMace @WolframMoebius @PagliaraExeter @bentemperton @UniofExeter @CLESUniofExeter @KimKardashian @GJMace you should read @neilhall_uk’s work.... right up your street. https://t.co/sgXW6TLb4l
RT @KerstinGrosch: When social media attention deviates from scientific success, scientists may receive underserving influential power. Jus…
@LindorffLarsen @karmecon Kardashian index is what you're after https://t.co/kaSQzcL0f6
RT @KerstinGrosch: When social media attention deviates from scientific success, scientists may receive underserving influential power. Jus…
When social media attention deviates from scientific success, scientists may receive underserving influential power. Just came across this not really new but really cool idea about a Kardashian Index for scientists @neilhall_uk https://t.co/z09im1FUnr
Hahahahaha. The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists | Genome Biology | Full Text https://t.co/3kM8sgk2vp
@NicoleNugentPhD The Kardashian index: https://t.co/6vV4DkxLEx
What is your #Scientific #Kardashian index? Are you a scientific fake celebrity? lol https://t.co/sqS4SqKfde https://t.co/I47Fbmq84y
Excellent @MartialS81 ! Mon #Kardashian -index de 0,29 me situe loin en dessous de la droite de régression. C'est grave docteur ?
RT @MartialS81: Je viens de découvrir le K-index=(nb followers Twitter)/(nb citations). Bientôt dans nos évaluations ? The Kardashian index…
Je viens de découvrir le K-index=(nb followers Twitter)/(nb citations). Bientôt dans nos évaluations ? The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists https://t.co/weS0h38kkx
Worth a (re)read: most Kardashians are men! The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists https://t.co/pvk1G3ickX #cygna_london @LNVH_NL @WHENequality #wiasn
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists https://t.co/5cU0zXzLbi #
RT @ebpetroff: Oh, fun. A new way to guilt/shame scientists who also actively work to engage with the public on social media and explain sc…
RT @ebpetroff: Oh, fun. A new way to guilt/shame scientists who also actively work to engage with the public on social media and explain sc…
RT @ebpetroff: Oh, fun. A new way to guilt/shame scientists who also actively work to engage with the public on social media and explain sc…
Oh, fun. A new way to guilt/shame scientists who also actively work to engage with the public on social media and explain science in interesting and understandable ways. #KardashianIndex https://t.co/H2JkvETGly
My scientific #KardashianIndex K is 1.3 - safely below the critical value of 5, i.e. number of followers is in line with scientific recognition measured by citations (K=Twitter Followers/43.3 x Citations^0.32) HT @cees_dekker @GJCVeenstra #NotTooSerious ht
Attention scientists - are you under recognised (as well as under rewarded?). Calculate your Kardashian index; mine is currently 0.6, a fun thing to calculate on Sunday morning. Thanks to @cees_dekker for highlighting this metric. https://t.co/y1prVw4WxG
This is interesting! The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists https://t.co/9FfCJZGeQh
RT @cees_dekker: Haha, there’s an index for everything: I had never heard of the Kardashian Index, which is a measures the discrepancy betw…
Haha, there’s an index for everything: I had never heard of the Kardashian Index, which is a measures the discrepancy between a scientist's social media profile and publication record. Luckily my K-index is 3.2, below the critical value of 5 that indicate
5. One year of Twitter, ~300 followers, a modest impact according to some standards. For index lovers, a Kardashian index <0.45 (ratio of actual / expected number of followers given the number of scientific citations) #DoNotTakeThisTooSeriously https://
@IngoIsphording @APeichl @jsuedekum @YohannesBecker @haucap @BachmannRudi @HO2604 @Lars_Feld @Isabel_Schnabel @schnellenbachj @monikaturyna @AndrewWattEU @SDullien @ulfrinne @iza_bonn Wir brauchen dringend den Kardashian index... :) https://t.co/udLWybXjU6
Mine's 0.76
I am glad to be not far above the regression line (only by 10%), which means my reputation isn't too much over-rated!
@Olive_Free you are the leading @LCPO_Bordeaux researcher using this index 😂 The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists https://t.co/vywKxvxNg6
I am about where you are, about 0.1, with 260/2700.
In an age dominated by the cult of celebrity we, as scientists, need to protect ourselves from mindlessly lauding shallow popularity and take an informed and critical view of the value we place on the opinion of our peers. https://t.co/lkNsbVMX7j
RT @RensingStefan: What's your #Kardashian index? https://t.co/yZ3K33406g Mine is below the trendline, fortunately, roughly 600/6000 = 0.…
I am slightly above.....so slightly over-rated?!?! @dromius @KamounLab are you Kardashians?!?
RT @RensingStefan: What's your #Kardashian index? https://t.co/yZ3K33406g Mine is below the trendline, fortunately, roughly 600/6000 = 0.…
What's your #Kardashian index? https://t.co/yZ3K33406g Mine is below the trendline, fortunately, roughly 600/6000 = 0.1. :) @neilhall_uk
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists https://t.co/v6bi7YYTOD
What did I just read?...... The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists https://t.co/HRPIzpprTU
RT @BioBeef: ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the di…
Hoping this never becomes part of a P&T discussion!
How do you assess Tweeted science opinions? @neilhall_uk proposes "Kardashian index" (K = @Twitter followers/citations) to help others decide how much weight to give to Tweeted opinions (<5 = OK). Also suggests add K to scientist Twitter profiles. I did
RT @BioBeef: ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the di…
RT @BioBeef: ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the di…
RT @BioBeef: ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the di…
RT @BioBeef: ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the di…
RT @BioBeef: ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the di…
RT @BioBeef: ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the di…
RT @BioBeef: ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the di…
RT @BioBeef: ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the di…
RT @BioBeef: ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the di…
RT @BioBeef: ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the di…
Older article......but wow, just wow.
RT @BioBeef: ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the di…
RT @BioBeef: ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the di…
RT @DrHikov: My ‘Kardashian Index’ is 9.0 Thanks @BioBeef for the new metric to quote in my grant applications 😂 https://t.co/wZoub5E2M8
My ‘Kardashian Index’ is 9.0 Thanks @BioBeef for the new metric to quote in my grant applications 😂
RT @BioBeef: ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the di…
RT @BioBeef: ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the di…
RT @BioBeef: ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the di…
‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the direct comparison of numbers of citations and Twitter followers" # Twitter followers/# scientific citations I am a 9.4 FYI https://t
@LizyLowe You could provide your Kardashian Index https://t.co/oVSHH0QjYh
Are some #academics #famous for being famous? How to spot them? The #Kardashian #index: a measure of discrepant #socialmedia profile for #scientists by @neilhall_uk (open access). #citation #metrics https://t.co/CIH2Zx4Dec https://t.co/yeQ1io2K1J
The ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the direct comparison of numbers of citations and Twitter followers. by @neilhall_uk https://t.co/lUtVwrwVjz https://t.co/WOg7TXOZeP
My Kardashian index has now risen to 3. Thank you very much for following me, can you please cite more of my papers as well? https://t.co/J78YAw6NVf
RT @edgarvlermamd: Kardashian index... anyone? #SoMe #meded 👉🏼 https://t.co/MWV4FLTtnc https://t.co/4Yf74ZJjaq