@CuriousMZD This is also a The Kardashian index https://t.co/I3jOH3zyfA
@eripsa What about the Kardashian index? https://t.co/UWHKfFDIIw
Interesting! Given my 1k Twitter followers and 38k citations in Google Scholar, my Kardashian index is 0.9 https://t.co/x8KonUSirb https://t.co/DQFHRFZNqe https://t.co/DTYA4qjeWu
RT @efapostolou29: @chrmosimann @JasonSynaptic @MCHammer Yes and it's called k-index (K for Kardashian...) https://t.co/WUI5zsflur
@chrmosimann @JasonSynaptic @MCHammer Yes and it's called k-index (K for Kardashian...) https://t.co/WUI5zsflur
@irinakitop @TassosPerrakis Published in a well respected journal a few years ago https://t.co/f5vD3P57Px
@vlal42 @GidMK Stuff like this is the reason the "Kardashian Index" for academics was created https://t.co/wBjuUylaGs
@gradydoctor @WrayCharles @NEJM @ShikhaJainMD Just make sure you cite this paper 😂❤️ https://t.co/ytl3tTHTGa
Interesting
Huge thanks to @AliOilhan for bringing this Kardashian index paper to my attention! Very interesting & fun reading that showcases the world of discrepency between one's publication record and high academic public profile on social media https://t.co/
Science Kardashian!!??? Thank @neilhall_uk!! It made me laugh!! 😂😂😂But!! There is an interesting trend on @Twitter dealing with scientists with verified versus scientists with non-verified profiles. #AcademicChatter https://t.co/4hF5GLEFl7
@timminglab There is another interesting ratio, that is related to the number of followers and the number of citations: the K-index https://t.co/fZenZu3sUR
@zanchettin83 E a K-index come stai? https://t.co/U4BPXmCgZs
RT @alexchicchi: Ai 3200 fw esco il Kardashian index https://t.co/k8h03O6qyg https://t.co/cLrlK5q83Q
E su, mancano pochi fw, così poi c'è un'altra occasione di rilancio e confronto sul K del Puglisi & co. 👇
Dai, 10 followers ed è fatta!
RT @alexchicchi: Ai 3200 fw esco il Kardashian index https://t.co/k8h03O6qyg https://t.co/cLrlK5q83Q
Insomma ce vuole proprio costringere...
Must-have index for the next centralized national publish-or-perish evaluation.
RT @alexchicchi: Ai 3200 fw esco il Kardashian index https://t.co/k8h03O6qyg https://t.co/cLrlK5q83Q
RT @alexchicchi: Ai 3200 fw esco il Kardashian index https://t.co/k8h03O6qyg https://t.co/cLrlK5q83Q
RT @alexchicchi: Ai 3200 fw esco il Kardashian index https://t.co/k8h03O6qyg https://t.co/cLrlK5q83Q
RT @alexchicchi: Ai 3200 fw esco il Kardashian index https://t.co/k8h03O6qyg https://t.co/cLrlK5q83Q
RT @alexchicchi: Ai 3200 fw esco il Kardashian index https://t.co/k8h03O6qyg https://t.co/cLrlK5q83Q
Ai 3200 fw esco il Kardashian index https://t.co/k8h03O6qyg https://t.co/cLrlK5q83Q
RT @jpGattuso: K-index, the ‘Kardashian Index’, is a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication reco…
@HarmitMalik Yes. One of the stupidest papers that Genome Biology every published https://t.co/wELYpm6HLe
@gwb777 @MikePenceFly___ @KimKardashian Fair point. Increasing in clout will only worsen my Kardashian index: https://t.co/wlUWWwckDa
@alikhan28 @choo_ek @MDaware @IshaniG @RealCedricDark There is such a thing FYI https://t.co/ytl3tTHTGa
@DorfmanJeffrey @marcfbellemare @ForbesOpinion Yeah and how will you discuss the K-index? https://t.co/3mHsBNug96
RT @carlhknutsen: Hypothesis 1: Coming up with the term "Kardashian index" increases your Kardashian index score. Hypothesis 2: Tweeting a…
RT @li63ra: The best advice today: I propose that all scientists calculate their own K-index on an annual basis and include it in their Twi…
RT @li63ra: The best advice today: I propose that all scientists calculate their own K-index on an annual basis and include it in their Twi…
The best advice today: I propose that all scientists calculate their own K-index on an annual basis and include it in their Twitter profile- if your K-index gets above 5, then it’s time to get off Twitter and write those papers.
Hypothesis 1: Coming up with the term "Kardashian index" increases your Kardashian index score. Hypothesis 2: Tweeting about the Kardashian index increases your Kardashian index score. (Getting ready for data collection) https://t.co/FoV8eGibSK
@ionicasmeets @ReintJanRenes Draagt natuurlijk wel bij aan je Kardashian Index: https://t.co/OFbf1Kaebi
@MJAckermanMDPhD @drjohnm @RFRedberg The k index https://t.co/y1prVwmxWg
RT @CoronaryDoc: ⭕ What is Kardashian Index (K Index)❓ A measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s #SoMe profile & publication record…
RT @DrRyanPDaly: Still a thing eh? 🤷🏼♂️. @OKhaliqueMD @onco_cardiology
RT @CoronaryDoc: ⭕ What is Kardashian Index (K Index)❓ A measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s #SoMe profile & publication record…
RT @CoronaryDoc: ⭕ What is Kardashian Index (K Index)❓ A measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s #SoMe profile & publication record…
Still a thing eh? 🤷🏼♂️. @OKhaliqueMD @onco_cardiology
RT @CoronaryDoc: ⭕ What is Kardashian Index (K Index)❓ A measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s #SoMe profile & publication record…
RT @CoronaryDoc: ⭕ What is Kardashian Index (K Index)❓ A measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s #SoMe profile & publication record…
RT @CoronaryDoc: ⭕ What is Kardashian Index (K Index)❓ A measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s #SoMe profile & publication record…
Followers are a summation of Twitter (this handle included) and ResearchGate. We couldn't have determined our K-index without the pioneering work of @neilhall_uk (https://t.co/IkCFplLTHN)
@MinkkinenSimo @MikaelNiku @GisseProf @MarkkuPeltonen Kardashian index: Tikkinen 1,63 Peltonen 0,49 https://t.co/AMjBMDsK8B
RT @kprather88: Interesting metric.
RT @HuffmanLabDU: @kprather88 Answer: mandate use of the k-index! 😉 @neilhall_uk proposed "the ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepanc…
Interesting metric.
@kprather88 Answer: mandate use of the k-index! 😉 @neilhall_uk proposed "the ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the direct comparison of numbers of citations and Twitter
Es usted un cientifico o un kardashian? (a.k.a. figuretti). ¿Cómo le irá a tanto gurú mediático? https://t.co/jywi1AuABH
RT @suuz_beck: @careerconversa1 Have you read the science karddashian paper?! A somewhat tongue in cheek yet surprisingly useful metric 👌…
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists https://t.co/vhiJ399FZ5
@careerconversa1 Have you read the science karddashian paper?! A somewhat tongue in cheek yet surprisingly useful metric 👌 https://t.co/SjhmKnT0LW
@AndreaRoventini Letto almeno il paper che propone l’index? È dichiaratamente una misura senza nessun rigore, una provocazione totale, tra l’altro calcolata su settore biomedico e quindi non traslabile ad altre discipline. Sono due pagine, per chi volesse
Can't have the @KUWTK end now! My Kardashian Index is almost a perfect 1.00 K-Index = Twitter Followers / Citations 1.0102 = 2087 / 2066 https://t.co/KZtalrf17B
@BillGrossMD @HarrietHopfMD @deepak_neuro @SapnaKmd @TomVargheseJr @dr_rajgupta @PascalJabbourMD @gropperUCSF @arghavan_salles According to this paper https://t.co/6K6t69HhGY, "the analysis is flawed and lacks statistical rigor." However, according to the
Oh, and this is probably the only ranking in which I am listed above @NicolaiFoss 😂 By the way, please don't mention the k-index here! 🤪https://t.co/82DRnajtJU
@winstanley_c Maybe the kardashian index can be reinvented for general celebrities to gain an idea? https://t.co/BADOqYypuE
RT @MarioBarbatti: @faherreraur Don't be surprised... Take a look at: https://t.co/ntbD7b9OWX
@faherreraur Don't be surprised... Take a look at: https://t.co/ntbD7b9OWX
@faherreraur @MarioBarbatti Do you mean the Kardashian index? cc @A_Aspuru_Guzik https://t.co/tpiN8rlvem
RT @DrS_Reynolds: Worthy of far more praise - Introducing the K(ardashian) index as a new metric (of academic notoriety)
Worthy of far more praise - Introducing the K(ardashian) index as a new metric (of academic notoriety)
And yes, I did click on the link to ref 10, The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists by @neilhall_uk, and I calculated my K index to be about 2.5, but I'm not sure if that's good or bad! 😉 https://t.co/gGXNlGh7q0
Pelinsu meşe çıktı
@Matthew__Watson Not sure how you read your H-index there Watson. Do you mean #citations?? Regardless, reminded me of this beauty: https://t.co/v5gUKAfCRq (and the time @lukewestern90 and I calculated it for various ES academics)
#PhDatDKFZ discussing the Kardashian index 😅 Have you heard about it? https://t.co/UhJUR8RnIi
Cuando veo algunas entrevistas a expertos locales recuerdo este interesante artículo https://t.co/vPJYQ67bJx
Today is the day I made sure @daniilprigozhin had read ‘The Kardashian Index’ by @neilhall_uk https://t.co/v0f4h1JyCz
RT @urbanhobbit: Yeri gelmişken akademide Kardashian endeksi konusunu yeniden açalım. Kardashian "ünlü olduğu için ünlü" olanların ilk örn…
Yeri gelmişken akademide Kardashian endeksi konusunu yeniden açalım. Kardashian "ünlü olduğu için ünlü" olanların ilk örneklerinden. Akademik ortamda da gelişen bir fenomen bu, neden uzman, çünkü uzman sayısı artıyor. https://t.co/B2j4yxMGMo
RT @urbanhobbit: Kardashian Skorum hiç umut verici değil... Gençlerden beklentim bunun da sıralamasını yapmaları... https://t.co/jwXuB21lo…
Kardashian Skorum hiç umut verici değil... Gençlerden beklentim bunun da sıralamasını yapmaları... https://t.co/jwXuB21loS https://t.co/hMbQ2d2abd
Me divertí mucho con esto https://t.co/9cerRAUIeJ
@TobyRichardsUWA @Neil_J_Smart @Jonathansegal85 @AcademicSurgery @ColemanDM_vasc @MJA_Editor @Jasosamd @FrankRybicki @ProfGreenhalgh @DrPascalMeier @JJEarnshaw @ArtsyTwits @robhinchliffe1 Need to get some aesthetic surgery and show those legs, Toby. Or hir
@Martin_A_Nunez https://t.co/dsufJYouOu is it this one?? There is a very good thread of replies as well criticizing this view.
@amlewis4 BTW #KardashianIndex is a real thing! https://t.co/4zcfhmi9pj
Should we start using #KardashianIndex in our scientific twitter profiles? Read this paper about social media by @neilhall_uk https://t.co/R62AYaoJtz The top Kardashians of #Nephtwitter @Nephro_Sparks @kidney_boy @hswapnil @edgarvlermamd
#KardashianIndex??? I’m definitely a #hasbeen.
@Nephro_Sparks @GenNextMD @hswapnil @kidney_boy @DearbhlaKelly4 @bryan_reidy @aoglasser @tony_breu @Brent_Thoma Which is why there is the #KardashianIndex gap. Similar to the h-index, the kardashian index unfairly penalizes publicly interactive scientists
@HuetSylvestre @LaConvCA L'indice Kardashian pourrait être une piste pour "normaliser" le rayonnement scientifique vs. la communication sur les réseaux sociaux. https://t.co/2AP8iTYJY2
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the direct comparison of numbers of citations and Twitter followers. Borghi & Bagnai (in the attached picture with Rinaldi) Itali
@Hector_E_Ortiz El original (2014) tiene que ver con el perfil de los científicos en twitter y es más bien una sátira https://t.co/esAD4HjOsm . Aunque siguen mencionándolo en artículos
@SamStellpflug This is literally a thing https://t.co/M6CgIectHG
@MikeMayne16 @PantheraSteven @FatEmperor @nataliexdean @JamesTodaroMD Welcome to Twitter. This may help you find the signal in the noise. It doesn’t work well with division by zero followers. https://t.co/5m2GJd7qWc https://t.co/Yyk2wqa0A4
@paul_pearce @mark_riedl @jeffbigham I believe this is what you're looking for: https://t.co/t7kMaMG9zB
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists (para recordar) https://t.co/vPJYQ67bJx
RT @dsalvil: @MATrippo @covid_rehab @rehab4covid @fake_journals @fakejournals @CSP @PaulGlasziou @GSCollins Do #FOAMed and #FOAMcc become…
RT @dsalvil: @MATrippo @covid_rehab @rehab4covid @fake_journals @fakejournals @CSP @PaulGlasziou @GSCollins Do #FOAMed and #FOAMcc become…
RT @dsalvil: @MATrippo @covid_rehab @rehab4covid @fake_journals @fakejournals @CSP @PaulGlasziou @GSCollins Do #FOAMed and #FOAMcc become…