@MATrippo @covid_rehab @rehab4covid @fake_journals @fakejournals @CSP @PaulGlasziou @GSCollins Do #FOAMed and #FOAMcc become peer reviewers? There is something at https://t.co/KZTREAmXuU and at https://t.co/oIggKL9WT6 Thanks for critical reading!
@PHuenermund But beware: https://t.co/3mHsBNug96
RT @KeikoUTorii: Kardashian Index (K-index): F=43.3C↑0.32 K-index =F(a)/F(c) where a= n, Twitter Followers c=n, total citation https://t.co…
Talking about inflating citations through social media and inequalities between women and men in that matter (SPOILER ALERT: Most Kardashians are men!)
Kardashian Index (K-index): F=43.3C↑0.32 K-index =F(a)/F(c) where a= n, Twitter Followers c=n, total citation https://t.co/GZGYuQNdIQ
RT @EtienneHanelt: @c_drosten Touché! Hat eigentlich schonmal jemand den Kardashian-Index (Hall 2014) von Drosten und Kekulé berechnet? Ic…
@c_drosten Touché! Hat eigentlich schonmal jemand den Kardashian-Index (Hall 2014) von Drosten und Kekulé berechnet? Ich sehe Publikationspotential! 😍 https://t.co/JT0PUbEjSO
@kjoshanssen Not exactly something to maximize, but have you heard of the Kardashian index? https://t.co/x05wh0ViHS
RT @DrChrisBarton: Although still considered a Science Kardashian, I am proud to report I have not got by Kardashian index below 8 (was 11…
RT @erikMeira: I find the K-index an odd metric: Based on number of followers over number of citations. One is popularity as a communicator…
I find the K-index an odd metric: Based on number of followers over number of citations. One is popularity as a communicator the other is popularity as an author of scientific papers. The idea that popularity = quality in either respect is absurd.
RT @jeanvictorblanc: @BorisChaumette @NicolasRainteau @guillaumefond @CfpNathalie Oubliez le H Index, the Kardashian index is the new thing…
@BorisChaumette @NicolasRainteau @guillaumefond @CfpNathalie Oubliez le H Index, the Kardashian index is the new thing https://t.co/T2m4fPMP5G
RT @OPUS_TJR: Watch @DrChrisBarton's webinar to see what in the world the Kardashion Index is! 😜🤳 Hint: if you're on Twitter right now, yo…
RT @OPUS_TJR: Watch @DrChrisBarton's webinar to see what in the world the Kardashion Index is! 😜🤳 Hint: if you're on Twitter right now, yo…
Watch @DrChrisBarton's webinar to see what in the world the Kardashion Index is! 😜🤳 Hint: if you're on Twitter right now, you're going to want to find out... https://t.co/q4OIuJIDJG @CHESM_unimelb @UniMelbMDHS @latrobe @AcademicChatter
Thanks for the suggestion @DrChrisBarton. My K-index is 2 -- am doing it wrong?
RT @3rdreviewer: The Kardashian Index is the gift that keeps on giving: https://t.co/HILaVOBtP6
Although still considered a Science Kardashian, I am proud to report I have not got by Kardashian index below 8 (was 11 when I last checked in 2018) @neilhall_uk I reckon 5 is too low 😂 https://t.co/fziLqrMUXj https://t.co/KtrQoyYaHT
@CharlesOppenh @UWankings What about the k index https://t.co/stRFbfbxPy
RT @MatiasDMargaret: While going through @petrmatous' "None of my research papers has made as much impact here [on Twitter] as a man wrappe…
Very interesting indeed:)
RT @MatiasDMargaret: While going through @petrmatous' "None of my research papers has made as much impact here [on Twitter] as a man wrappe…
While going through @petrmatous' "None of my research papers has made as much impact here [on Twitter] as a man wrapped in plastic bags", I chanced upon this K-index. Very interesting! https://t.co/jpXLKdkq7e Thanks, @IEinav! #scicomm #AcademicTwitter http
@luisalow_ @petrmatous I actually think it’s pretty accurate, and could be generalized to include my own papers. Have you heard about the K-index? https://t.co/ZqXt9TAjET Just keep it up with those twitts!
@spwells K index https://t.co/nVxcDohEnl
D'un point de vue purement factuel, je crois que #KarineLacombe relève plus du #Kardashian_Index que du #h_Index. C'est tout dire. https://t.co/Uc7lQMaVqq
@alikhan28 🤷🏻♀️ scientifically I always assumed my “kardashian index” wasn’t high enough 😂 https://t.co/ytl3tTHTGa
Vous pouvez trouver la publication de Niel Hall dans Genome Biology 2014, 15:424 https://t.co/RqxR17ftP6 2/10 https://t.co/VsYDrHvwwn
@tallinzen I used to do a lecture for a course called Media, Culture, and Mind and I had the students read Hall's paper https://t.co/TCWDB8QowK and @micahgallen's response https://t.co/TBNztbSDLp
@PeterHotez @khloekardashian @instagram I don’t know if you remember this but in your tropical medicine class in 2013 you referenced this article about the impact scientists can have with the public with social media. Funny coincidences. https://t.co/KfGn
RT @KagiyamaNobu: ちなみに K-index 自体は2014年に報告された Genome Biology という遺伝学の雑誌にて発案された指標です 恐る恐る自分の K-index を計算すると 7 を超えていたことをここに申告いたします。。。🤮 「違うんです…
ちなみに K-index 自体は2014年に報告された Genome Biology という遺伝学の雑誌にて発案された指標です 恐る恐る自分の K-index を計算すると 7 を超えていたことをここに申告いたします。。。🤮 「違うんです!私泥棒じゃありません!」(心の声) 続 https://t.co/TKkCsS2IHq
RT @Sugeng_Lissa: Thank you @neilhall_uk for raising this observation. I calculated my K-index and thankfully is <1 #NeedHerScience #Wome…
👆here (a couple of years ago) I was suggesting something that was actually published 4 years before: the Kardashian index! 😅 #genius https://t.co/8He73pSsK8
Thank you @neilhall_uk for raising this observation. I calculated my K-index and thankfully is <1 #NeedHerScience #WomenInMedicine @WomenAs1 https://t.co/11XaQ8jPoL
@almucastro01 @ResiSec Pues creo que viene de aquí, y cuantas más publicaciones tienes mayor es el dividendo con lo cual más difícil es tener un I-K alto! Pero luego lo miro bien que ahora me toca "dar la mano". Abrazos https://t.co/isE5IO2czN https://t.c
RT @MenaspaP: The ‘Kardashian Index’ is a measure of difference between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record. The high…
RT @MenaspaP: The ‘Kardashian Index’ is a measure of difference between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record. The high…
RT @MenaspaP: The ‘Kardashian Index’ is a measure of difference between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record. The high…
RT @MenaspaP: The ‘Kardashian Index’ is a measure of difference between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record. The high…
RT @MenaspaP: The ‘Kardashian Index’ is a measure of difference between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record. The high…
Maybe I should’ve added this “K-index” to my mid-tenure dossier? 🤔
The "Kardashian Index" measures citations to number of followers, but the X number of followers doesn't mean your tweet is seen/cited by X number of followers. And if Google Scholar is used, the number of self-citations are included in the total number o
😂😂👌
The ‘Kardashian Index’ is a measure of difference between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record. The higher the index, the better the (social media) communication skills. Here the original paper by @neilhall_uk on @GenomeBiology 👇 htt
RT @elenagomezdiaz: Interesting except for the metrics used to measure pub "quality" The ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy betw…
RT @elenagomezdiaz: Interesting except for the metrics used to measure pub "quality" The ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy betw…
RT @elenagomezdiaz: Interesting except for the metrics used to measure pub "quality" The ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy betw…
@love_kitkat Yes, as long as one does not try to achieve high K-index..... : ) https://t.co/eoo5E3KmZL
RT @elenagomezdiaz: Interesting except for the metrics used to measure pub "quality" The ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy betw…
RT @elenagomezdiaz: Interesting except for the metrics used to measure pub "quality" The ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy betw…
On the #sciencewomanday, it’s interesting read and highlight the point that women have a lower k index. Could be because we have to work harder to get a #publication or a #grant and therefore we have less time for social media? What do you think? https://
Have you calculated your Kardashian index? @neilhall_uk https://t.co/b66SdPtR9P
RT @elenagomezdiaz: Interesting except for the metrics used to measure pub "quality" The ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy betw…
RT @AlbertoFdezSoto: Hoy gracias a un post de @elenagomezdiaz veo este artículo en @GenomeBiology que, en su idea, se parece bastante (pero…
"...if your K-index gets above 5, then it’s time to get off Twitter and write those papers" 4713 fologüers / 865 citas en scholar = 5.45 Oooops! :(
Hoy gracias a un post de @elenagomezdiaz veo este artículo en @GenomeBiology que, en su idea, se parece bastante (pero lo plantea un poco más en serio). Va a ser verdad que hay algo que medir entre popularidad y ciencia. https://t.co/Ykp7P1mOAx
RT @elenagomezdiaz: Interesting except for the metrics used to measure pub "quality" The ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy betw…
RT @elenagomezdiaz: Interesting except for the metrics used to measure pub "quality" The ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy betw…
RT @elenagomezdiaz: Interesting except for the metrics used to measure pub "quality" The ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy betw…
RT @elenagomezdiaz: Interesting except for the metrics used to measure pub "quality" The ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy betw…
RT @elenagomezdiaz: Interesting except for the metrics used to measure pub "quality" The ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy betw…
Interesting except for the metrics used to measure pub "quality" The ‘Kardashian Index’, a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on comparison of no. citations and #twitter followers @GenomeBiology
per la prossima #VQR propongo che si calcoli anche il Kardashian index individuale e dipartimentale!! https://t.co/KyOgA2Po4l ;-)
@VPrasadMDMPH @boback @venkmurthy While praising “old-school” research in traditional journals, @califf001 doesn’t seem to be very thorough in his citations here. Does not cite the original paper on K Index and almost seems to suggest a misattribution.
@BMatB @CharlesOppenh @seis_matters @BantshireUni I can help you with that. https://t.co/iPUyZGHpiN
RT @DhirajGuptaBHRS: Interesting as a discussion topic at the doctors canteen, but as with most metrics, likely to be meaningless at the ma…
RT @DhirajGuptaBHRS: Interesting as a discussion topic at the doctors canteen, but as with most metrics, likely to be meaningless at the ma…
RT @drskharlamov: It looks like I am undervalued Science Kardashian ☝️😎 https://t.co/P54y0NxmcE
RT @CoronaryDoc: ⭕ What is Kardashian Index (K Index)❓ A measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s #SoMe profile & publication record…
RT @drskharlamov: It looks like I am undervalued Science Kardashian ☝️😎 https://t.co/P54y0NxmcE
It looks like I am undervalued Science Kardashian ☝️😎 https://t.co/P54y0NxmcE
RT @CoronaryDoc: ⭕ What is Kardashian Index (K Index)❓ A measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s #SoMe profile & publication record…
RT @CoronaryDoc: ⭕ What is Kardashian Index (K Index)❓ A measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s #SoMe profile & publication record…
RT @DhirajGuptaBHRS: Interesting as a discussion topic at the doctors canteen, but as with most metrics, likely to be meaningless at the ma…
RT @CoronaryDoc: ⭕ What is Kardashian Index (K Index)❓ A measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s #SoMe profile & publication record…
RT @DhirajGuptaBHRS: Interesting as a discussion topic at the doctors canteen, but as with most metrics, likely to be meaningless at the ma…
RT @CoronaryDoc: ⭕ What is Kardashian Index (K Index)❓ A measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s #SoMe profile & publication record…
RT @CoronaryDoc: ⭕ What is Kardashian Index (K Index)❓ A measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s #SoMe profile & publication record…
The Kardashian Index of Cardiologists. Celebrities or Experts? "Those people whose K-index is greater than 5 can be considered 'Science Kardashians'....
RT @CoronaryDoc: ⭕ What is Kardashian Index (K Index)❓ A measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s #SoMe profile & publication record…
RT @CoronaryDoc: ⭕ What is Kardashian Index (K Index)❓ A measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s #SoMe profile & publication record…
Definitely not a Kardashian ( K-index 0.314)...
RT @CoronaryDoc: ⭕ What is Kardashian Index (K Index)❓ A measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s #SoMe profile & publication record…
RT @CoronaryDoc: ⭕ What is Kardashian Index (K Index)❓ A measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s #SoMe profile & publication record…
⭕ What is Kardashian Index (K Index)❓ A measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s #SoMe profile & publication record 1⃣ https://t.co/tekOl6JUAN 2⃣ https://t.co/HluY3dPl3n ⭕ What is your K Index❓ Calculate your K Index here👇 https://t.co/UQ1CF3OdA
I need to know, what is my Kardashian Score!
My Kardashian score is 1.5 Keep your conclusions :) paper: https://t.co/ygHztPZKiC Compute your Kardashian score :): https://t.co/gti8Ly1flA #phdlife #phdchat #research #researchimpact https://t.co/HxA6GWP6ji
Ouf, mon Index de Kardashian est de 0.7. Celui là, plus on l'a petit mieux c'est ! Interprétation : ma (petite) notoriété Twitter est inferieure à ma crédibilité scientifique. Vous pouvez continuer à me suivre 😉
@leslieadriaanse
K-index of 1.9... Fairly balanced? 🤔 @neilhall_uk
The @Kim_Kardashiian index compares the number of #twitter followers against citations count. My K-score is low at 0.135; I should have 1600 followers for my number of citations! Guessing it fails for High Energy Physics (except maybe @ProfBrianCox )!
my #K-index is around 0.5... needs to better communicate?
A very interesting point 🤔
Interesting read 🧐😀