The '5 famous people' tweets reminded me of the Kardashian index: https://t.co/vRI4boVdQ0
As I divert attention from writing to see what's on Twitter I remind myself of this old chestnut -- the Kardashian Index. 1/2 https://t.co/ZWR2trKN9p
Me resisto a tener que trabajar en mi Kardashian Index https://t.co/49VSINavuA
Chimba hacer apropiación social del conocimiento, pero esto es too much para mí. https://t.co/0ykdYdKyfL
Querido @jeroriveracine que bello recuerdo, cc @CataCruz132 @twolance
Este paper, que propone un índice K (Kardashians) para los académicos, me recordó a nuestro estimado Sergio Roncallo. @hmurcia_q @twolance @CataCruz132 https://t.co/D18ZKovsEq
Menos mal que soy algo así como Kanye @TaniaLu jajajjajajaja
RT @TaniaLu: El "Kardashian Index", el "índice de impacto" que tiene un investigador/a en redes sociodigitales respecto a su labor científi…
El "Kardashian Index", el "índice de impacto" que tiene un investigador/a en redes sociodigitales respecto a su labor científica (esto atado a lo llamado marca personal): The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists htt
De no creer.
I didn't know about this, did you @OdedRechavi? 😉 https://t.co/eabBhjGZC1
No sabía que esto existía en la vida académica. Kardashian Index.
Me cuesta creer esto… @evoyeyo tell me more!!!! ¿Esto es más sonado allá en USA?
En medio de mi crisis existencial de vida académica, me encuentro con este Tweet, acompañado de este artículo, https://t.co/ZbP3FI7v1T ante esto uno no sabe si reír o llorar.
@ana_bosslady Yes apparently there s even a paper https://t.co/v4ns8qi6LN
Yo sería el punto 0 🤣 Ni idea que esto existía, me enteré porque vi por aquí que le rechazaron una beca a una postdoc por tener un bajo "Kardashian index". Locazo The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists https://t
RT @sue9a: TIL about the Kardashian index! #academictwitter #academicchatter @PhDVoice https://t.co/MlRoYRbF9z
TIL about the Kardashian index! #academictwitter #academicchatter @PhDVoice https://t.co/MlRoYRbF9z
@BorisTraue well, this might help you to come to terms with it: https://t.co/T3IwTV3SJF
@daviesbj @NYCRoboticTeam @Twitter But can look to Twitter Impact Factor by @DrCardonaGrau EurUrol 2016, but more relevant to Q of tweets/followers is Kardashian Index: https://t.co/owrpI7Bvi4
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists - Genome Biology https://t.co/HV2vY9PoIn
Hadn't seen this #webofscience feature yet that benchmarks citations of an article. Not sure how (well) it works? Have to remember this figure when struggling with a paper and questioning the impact of it all.😬 Thanks for reading and citing my research ❤️
This pandemic hasn't been good for my #kardashianindex #trusttrusttrust 😂 https://t.co/DfsyEThxfU https://t.co/K9qYBulZlC
The Kardashian index (mine is 2.24) https://t.co/IHVh1ajKJr
@HenryMcSorley @ProfAndrewMac Ah yes, but what is your Kardashian index? https://t.co/LnajnKJHWJ
@Cranky_Academic My Kardashian index is still < 1 (for this account and my real one). https://t.co/DQl2r9hxA3
Truly awesome read!!
RT @HenningLanger: @MarcusDGon There is something called "the Kardashian-index". 😁 https://t.co/CRMPFg2KUp
This is my favorite paper I’ve read all year. I’m sorry to be so late to the party @neilhall_uk
@MarcusDGon There is something called "the Kardashian-index". 😁 https://t.co/CRMPFg2KUp
Kardaşyan İndeksi! Akademik başarıyla sosyal medya tanınırlığını karşılaştıran ölçü, "ünlü olmakla ünlü" biliminsanlarına eleştirel yaklaşıyor. Popülerlikle akademik başarı arasındaki dengenin, akademik başarı aleyhine bozulduğu durumlar için bir uyarı. ht
"The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists" — a real paper from 2014
We all know what the h-index is. But have you heard of the K-index? Are you a #scienceKardashian? Calculate your K-index for your next job application👇 #AcademicTwitter #AcademicChatter #postdoclife #phdlife #sciencefun https://t.co/hcCZ2QOx32
Ahhh crap. I forgot to tag @LiinaStein !!! This is why my k-index is so low - always making mistakes in tweets. What's a k-index you ask? See here: https://t.co/L0ymLbh3f3
Just started a new account @CAMD_DISB to post updates about the activities of the Computer-assisted Molecular Design group Still just for fun, but in a different way Working on my Kardashian Index, which is currently below 0.5 :) https://t.co/nyeDTnzaHI
@statsepi But you’re a Kardashian, how can they be so disrespectful?
RT @hb_cell: seriously 😂😂 https://t.co/4SuRtv4qmS
RT @mendel_random: This is a great read; “if your K index gets above 5 it’s time to get off twitter and write that paper”. Would covid acad…
RT @RolandDunbrack: "...women have a history of being ignored by the scientific community. Interestingly, in my analysis, very few women ha…
"...women have a history of being ignored by the scientific community. Interestingly, in my analysis, very few women had a highly inflated Twitter following, while most (11/14) had fewer followers than would be expected. Hence, most Kardashians are men!" h
@trishgreenhalgh Reminds me of this paper on the #KardashianIndex https://t.co/lar4rtlbeu
This is a great read; “if your K index gets above 5 it’s time to get off twitter and write that paper”. Would covid academic twitter have been improved over the pandemic by this? 🤔 (on average, of course) …
@zexpe @andrew_croxford @devisridhar @chrischirp @dgurdasani1 @BallouxFrancois @trishgreenhalgh @BristOliver @apsmunro @Kit_Yates_Maths @jackiecassell @GrahamMedley @ShamezLadhani @mendel_random Here's the original paper. (COI, I am employed by BMC) http
This is fun although I’m not sure about how it calculates the index. I seem to remember seeing @BallouxFrancois was well cited when he was questioning the credentials of an iSAGE member. https://t.co/Y1nDetqlww
RT @OmarDum: My Kardashian index is 2.53. 😅 A high index is a warning that researcher X may have built their public profile on shaky found…
Warning shots have been fired!
Artigo do Índice K: https://t.co/pGC8nG8pfX
Apparently I am a Kardashian.. ;) although very marginally above the threshold https://t.co/Pq0R0L0p6K
seriously 😂😂 https://t.co/4SuRtv4qmS
Soy un Science Kardashian 🙈 https://t.co/ud0DzH1tJ4 https://t.co/jGA9GaN7eu https://t.co/H1ysCp0qCi
@itsmedipsikha @OpenAcademics @AcademicChatter Here’s the paper link :) https://t.co/uA53fog8TS
@bioBlogia @medel2021 I was thinking 🤔 is that real!!! Then I just read this paper https://t.co/rjFJubXfcL
Didn‘t know something like this exists.. how many of you did? https://t.co/KbuAqtJYlI @OpenAcademics @SL_Biology @neurolipidomics
How is your K-index!! https://t.co/crFwrFL5mb https://t.co/NN98IlDQrw
I thought the k-index was a joke. I am wrong. There’s a paper on it. I still cannot absorb it 😬 https://t.co/7diprVsL5m
I never knew this existed https://t.co/FdMcrjsBzL
@draparente @andrewwhite01 There's a citable article about it apparently, with 80+ citations no less! https://t.co/ePZlYmgpWG Happy to report my k-index is <1 🤓, though the suggested threshold of 5 is probably more relevant for the socially connected
I have a K-index of one. I am not a Kardashian scientist... sadly (or not) :D https://t.co/vuXBSt6J58
@adbacchi Acho que esse artigo reflete um pouco do que vivemos nas ciência atualmente. https://t.co/mGlOw99c9a
@prof_djadams 😂😂😂 It's the Kardashian-index! https://t.co/8NMVxCCPsN I told you, there's plenty of jewels when we hit the bottom!
@Carl_Sagan42 out of curiosity, what's your Kardashian number? https://t.co/ME4YRHAh3q
@gwalkden Kardashian index? https://t.co/qTwlkS8u0j
RT @Mzansi_4Science: The Kardashian Index (K-Index), named after Kim Kardashian. Proposed in 2014 by @neilhall_uk , the measure compares th…
The Kardashian Index (K-Index), named after Kim Kardashian. Proposed in 2014 by @neilhall_uk , the measure compares the number of followers a research scientist has on Twitter to the number of citations they have for their peer-reviewed work. https://t.co
Interesting article on Kardashian Index, please read. https://t.co/ERrjmqhcoS
Reference for above: https://t.co/8f5dbEpnoC
@inactinique l'article de départ, je pense : https://t.co/a1MOr8gdaR
Ric ha vinto il Kardashian Index Prize ..aprite il link e capirete
@EricLagadec @FredericPaletou @jaztrophysicist @JeromeBallot Vu le plot du papier original (https://t.co/vwHUq6vHI4), je crois que c'est largement dans les barres d'erreurs ! 😄 https://t.co/MMo6FA2IMy
RT @healthnewsch: The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists: https://t.co/AkJaiZleT3
The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists: https://t.co/AkJaiZleT3
RT @oneforall1024: 尾身茂先生を叩いた 茂木某のKardashian indexが 7000を超えるという計算を した人がいたwww 盛大に吹いたわw https://t.co/UGRiLMIAPU
@BasSchouwenberg @medischcontact @DokterBertho Dat heet de Kardashian index... 😅 https://t.co/LuoxGGEfJi
Here is the paper: https://t.co/tkh8V5rFXG
@Edit0r_At_Large Think we can add this to the Kardashian Index https://t.co/AdzPGcJr1K
@K_KalantarZadeh Mine is 0.18 😂😂🤹 However, "a very low K-index suggests that a scientist is being undervalued": https://t.co/8NMVxCCPsN
@kprather88 There is a paper with an amazing title on this phenomenon. I may or may not have checked my number of twitter followers (515) & number of citations (not stating) to see where I fall. I only know cause someone tweeted about the paper the o
RT @jljcolorado: This Kardashian index is actually on to something...
RT @BobTeskey: @MrBanks76037905 @WBahnfleth I was actually being serious... https://t.co/NaWI1KZYAu